Skip to main content

Security report for ptcfc.com

Cedexis · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and DNS health.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cedexis is a technology company now integrated as part of Citrix, focusing on enhancing employee experience to increase productivity and engagement. The website serves primarily as an announcement and redirect to Citrix's main site, indicating a strategic consolidation under the Citrix brand. The minimal content and lack of detailed business information suggest the site is maintained mainly for legacy or branding purposes rather than direct customer engagement. Technically, the site is simple, using basic HTML and CSS with no advanced frameworks or CMS detected. There is no evidence of analytics, tracking, or complex scripting, reflecting a low digital maturity level. Security posture is minimal with no visible security headers or policies, and the WHOIS data is unavailable or indicates the domain is not currently registered, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy. Overall, the site is safe but lacks comprehensive security and privacy compliance features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain: mx2.hc3370-68.iphmx.com

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory
    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain: mx1.hc3370-68.iphmx.com

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ptcfc.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Cedexis operates within the technology sector as a subsidiary of Citrix, leveraging Citrix's brand and infrastructure. The business model appears to be B2B, targeting enterprises seeking employee experience solutions. The lack of direct contact information or detailed service descriptions on the site suggests that Cedexis's operations are fully integrated into Citrix's ecosystem. The partnership with Citrix provides a strong market position and trust advantage. However, the absence of WHOIS data and minimal web presence could indicate recent domain changes or a transition phase. There are no indications of direct revenue streams or affiliate partnerships from the site itself.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a low security maturity level. There is no HTTPS verification visible in the data provided, no security headers, and no published privacy or cookie policies. The absence of contact or incident response information further limits transparency and trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, but the minimal security measures and lack of compliance documentation represent significant gaps. The WHOIS data inconsistency is a notable risk factor, potentially indicating domain registration issues. Overall, the security posture is weak and requires improvements to meet modern standards and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts.
  5. Regularly monitor domain registration status and ensure WHOIS data is accurate and up to date.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cedexis
Description
Cedexis is now part of Citrix, focusing on reimagining the employee experience by increasing productivity and engagement.
Key services
employee experience enhancement, productivity solutions
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, Public Sans font from Citrix CDN
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is minimal and acts as a redirect/announcement page for Cedexis being part of Citrix.
  2. No WHOIS data available for the domain, indicating possible domain expiration or privacy.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the page.
  4. No contact information or forms present on the page.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  6. No security headers or advanced security features detected.
  7. Website content is safe and corporate in nature.
  8. Branding is consistent with Citrix association.
  9. Technical implementation is basic with minimal content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML and CSS, utilizing a font hosted by Citrix. There is no evidence of a CMS or advanced JavaScript frameworks. The site performance is likely moderate due to minimal content and resources. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but functional. SEO optimization is minimal with no meta tags or structured data present. The hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the data. The technical simplicity reduces attack surface but also limits functionality and user engagement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ptcfc.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ptcfc.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.