Skip to main content

Security report for proximic.com

Proximic by Comscore · Technology · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Proximic by Comscore is a technology company specializing in privacy-centric, ID-free programmatic targeting solutions designed for brands and publishers. Positioned as a leader in contextual targeting, the company leverages advanced data and AI to enable audience engagement while respecting privacy regulations. Their offerings include predictive audiences and programmatic solutions tailored for media buyers and sellers, supported by a robust ecosystem of data partners. The company operates under the Comscore brand, a recognized entity in media measurement and analytics. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Video.js for media playback, Brightcove video platform, Google Tag Manager, and marketing tools such as Eloqua and LinkedIn Insight. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good user experience and professional design. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses reCAPTCHA for form protection. While explicit security headers are not fully confirmed, best practices appear to be followed. Privacy compliance is strong with visible cookie consent and a comprehensive privacy policy. However, the absence of a published security policy or incident response contact is noted. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility and technical maturity. The main limitation is the lack of WHOIS data, which slightly reduces trust but is mitigated by the brand association and professional presence. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security header implementation, publishing security policies, and adding vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching proximic.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
75
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Proximic by Comscore operates in the technology and media sectors, focusing on privacy-centric programmatic advertising solutions. Their competitive advantage lies in advanced contextual intelligence that does not rely on user identifiers, aligning with evolving privacy regulations. Revenue streams likely include licensing data segments, platform integrations, and partnerships with media buyers and sellers. The company targets large enterprises and media organizations seeking scalable, privacy-compliant audience targeting. The extensive partner ecosystem, including major data and advertising platforms, supports growth and market penetration. The brand's association with Comscore enhances credibility and market position.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforcement and use of reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse. Privacy compliance is evident through cookie consent and a detailed privacy policy. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and preparedness. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for the business type but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency around data retention policies and GDPR compliance to strengthen user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Proximic by Comscore
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Proximic by Comscore
Description
Proximic by Comscore powers the future of audience engagement with privacy-centric, ID-free targeting solutions for brands and publishers.
Key services
Predictive Audiences, Programmatic targeting solutions for media buyers, Programmatic targeting solutions for media sellers, Privacy-centric inventory curation, Audience segment activation
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Video.js, Brightcove Player, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), LinkedIn Insight Tag, ElqCfg (Eloqua marketing), Bootstrap, jQuery, Slick Carousel, reCAPTCHA v2
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Brightcove Video Platform
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent banner
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight, Eloqua
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, LinkedIn Ads
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, Eloqua
Marketing tools
Eloqua, LinkedIn Insight
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear branding and consistent messaging.
  2. Content focuses on privacy-centric programmatic targeting solutions.
  3. Multiple trusted third-party integrations and partners are referenced.
  4. No security or content blocking mechanisms detected.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, which slightly impacts trust but not critical given brand presence.
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and compliant.
  7. No explicit contact emails found in HTML; phone and address found in structured data.
  8. No terms of service or security policy pages explicitly found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with Video.js and Brightcove for video delivery, Bootstrap for responsive design, and multiple marketing and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager, Eloqua, and LinkedIn Insight. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident in meta tags and structured data. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by embedded video content and multiple third-party scripts. There is no clear CMS detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party services which require ongoing security management. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and streamline script loading for enhanced performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 79/100Low24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with proximic.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review proximic.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.