Skip to main content

Security report for promisepartnership.org

Promise Partnership · Education · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Promise Partnership is a Utah-based non-profit organization dedicated to transforming education from cradle to career by uniting public and private sectors. The organization acts as a backbone entity facilitating partnerships and community engagement to improve educational outcomes and support student success across Utah. It holds a strong market position as a leading collective impact organization with national recognition from StriveTogether. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand with clear messaging and a focus on community impact. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using modern tools and integrates multiple analytics and marketing platforms, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and domain protections, though improvements are needed in security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is lacking as no privacy or cookie policies are found, representing a compliance risk. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but should enhance privacy and security transparency to improve compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching promisepartnership.org

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention promisepartnership.org, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for promisepartnership.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the education and non-profit sectors, targeting community stakeholders, educators, and partners in Utah. Its business model centers on partnership building and collective impact rather than direct revenue generation. The organization benefits from strategic partnerships and national affiliations, enhancing its credibility and reach. The website content and structure support its mission and provide transparency on results and engagement opportunities. Growth indicators include recent recertifications and active community programs. The partnership ecosystem is robust, with clear calls to action for involvement and support. The organization maintains a medium size with a focused regional presence.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses domain status protections, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or security policy information is published, limiting transparency and preparedness visibility. The site uses multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts, increasing the attack surface and privacy considerations. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of DNSSEC is a minor risk. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be improved by implementing security headers, publishing security policies, and enabling DNSSEC.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security.
  5. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Promise Partnership
Description
Promise Partnership unites public and private sectors to support student success, from cradle to career. It is a cross-sector, cradle-to-career collective impact organization working to ensure every child can achieve their potential in Utah.
Key services
Building partnerships in public and private sectors, Supporting student success in Community Schools and Promise Communities, Acting as backbone organization for cross-sector collaboration, Data and results transparency, Community engagement and support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Bricks Builder theme, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (GA4), Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Fundraise Up donation widget, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
StriveTogether (partnership framework)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security status domain flags in WHOIS (clientDeleteProhibited etc.)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (GA4), Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, Moat Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
PulsePoint, DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Pardot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional non-profit organization focused on education in Utah.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with valid email and phone.
  4. Use of multiple analytics and marketing tools with moderate tracking.
  5. No visible security headers; DNSSEC not enabled.
  6. Domain uses privacy protection but is consistent with business type.
  7. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Bricks Builder theme, leveraging modern web technologies and integrations such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Fundraise Up for donations. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing performance and security benefits. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data. Performance is moderate, with lazy loading and optimized images. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting the organization's digital engagement goals effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with promisepartnership.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review promisepartnership.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.