Skip to main content

Security report for prometric.com

Prometric · Education · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Prometric is a global enterprise specializing in secure assessment design and delivery solutions, serving test takers, certification bodies, educational institutions, and professional organizations. The company offers a broad portfolio of services including assessment development, global delivery, candidate experience enhancement, and AI-powered exam development. Their market position is strong as a leader in secure testing with a vast network of test centers worldwide. The website reflects a mature digital presence with multi-language support and comprehensive resources for various stakeholders. Technically, the website is built on modern technologies including Craft CMS, Tailwind CSS, and integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, with a moderate performance profile. Security best practices are evident with HTTPS enforcement, security headers, CSRF protection, and a detailed cookie consent mechanism. Security posture is robust with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of explicit incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests areas for improvement. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy, cookie consent banner, and GDPR indicators. Business credibility is high, supported by professional content, consistent branding, and trust signals. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with strong business and technical foundations. Strategic enhancements in transparency around incident response and vulnerability disclosure would further strengthen trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching prometric.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
87
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Prometric operates in the education and technology sectors, focusing on secure exam delivery and workforce development. Their business model centers on providing assessment services and technology solutions to professional and educational markets globally. The company leverages patented AI technologies to accelerate exam development and offers both in-center and remote delivery options. Their target customers include certification bodies, educational institutions, and individual test takers. The website content and navigation indicate a mature, enterprise-level operation with a global footprint. Partnerships and integrations with major platforms like Vimeo and Calendly support their service delivery. The absence of direct contact emails but presence of contact forms suggests controlled communication channels. The company maintains a strong brand presence and invests in marketing and analytics tools to optimize user engagement and program growth.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented. The use of Google reCAPTCHA and CSRF tokens indicates attention to bot mitigation and form security. Cookie consent is granular and compliant with privacy regulations. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of publicly available incident response contacts or a vulnerability disclosure policy limits transparency and may hinder rapid response to security incidents. The WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which is justified given the sensitive nature of the business. Overall, the security maturity is high but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Publish explicit incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and facilitate security communications.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Include data protection officer contact details if applicable to strengthen GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency on data retention policies and user data handling to align with best privacy practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Prometric
Description
Prometric provides industry-leading assessment design and delivery solutions. Find exams and resources to meet your certification needs.
Key services
Assessment Development, Global Delivery, Candidate Experience, Program Growth, Security, AI Exam Development, Remote Delivery, Test Prep, Content Library
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, CookieYes Consent Management, Tailwind CSS, Craft CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with detailed categories
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • CSRF token cookie for form security

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
CookieYes
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with detailed categories
  3. Strong branding and consistent navigation structure
  4. Multiple language support with hreflang tags
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  6. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected
  7. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed, contact via form
  8. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page
  9. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly due to privacy protection
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Craft CMS with Tailwind CSS for styling, indicating a modern and maintainable technology stack. Integration of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel supports advanced analytics and marketing capabilities. The site is mobile responsive and accessible, with proper meta tags and SEO optimizations. Performance is moderate, likely due to the use of multiple external scripts and rich content. The presence of CSRF tokens and reCAPTCHA enhances security for user interactions. There is no indication of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the provided HTML. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence suitable for an enterprise-level assessment services provider.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with prometric.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review prometric.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.