Skip to main content

Security report for proks.com

Proks · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Proks is an established Latvian trading and distribution company specializing in supplying top brand computer components and consumer electronics globally, with a strong focus on the Baltic States. Founded in 1992, the company serves a diverse clientele including distributors, retailers, and PC assemblers across more than 62 countries. Their business model centers on wholesale distribution, supported by owned warehouse facilities and a portfolio of official brand partnerships, including a private label for household appliances. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, with good content quality and clear navigation. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern web technologies and Google Fonts integration. It demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization but lacks advanced accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, though it lacks security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR compliance indicators. Overall, the website is credible and trustworthy, supported by domain registration consistency and business legitimacy indicators such as credit ratings and certifications. However, improvements in privacy compliance, security transparency, and accessibility would enhance the site's maturity and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching proks.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
58
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Proks holds a leading position in the Baltic distribution market for computer components and consumer electronics, leveraging long-standing industry experience and financial stability. Their competitive advantage lies in official distribution rights for multiple global brands and a proprietary private label, enabling diversified revenue streams. The company targets B2B customers including wholesalers, retailers, and assemblers, emphasizing accuracy, punctuality, and logistics efficiency. Growth indicators include expanding partnerships across EU countries and maintaining a large operational warehouse. The partnership ecosystem is robust, with certifications and credit ratings reinforcing market confidence. Strategic observations suggest focusing on digital marketing and privacy compliance to capture broader market segments and regulatory adherence.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, limiting transparency and preparedness. The lack of cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR compliance indicators represents a compliance gap. No vulnerable libraries or insecure forms were detected. Overall, the security posture is adequate for informational purposes but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to ensure GDPR compliance.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Proks
Description
Proks is a trading and distribution company specializing in global supply of top brand computer components and consumer electronics, with a strong presence in the Baltic States. Established in 1992 in Riga, Latvia, it serves partners in over 62 countries across 5 continents, focusing on accuracy, punctuality, and financial stability. The company distributes multiple global brands and has developed its own private label EIRON for household appliances.
Key services
Distribution of computer components, Wholesale supply, Private label development (EIRON), Logistics and stock management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Google Fonts, JavaScript, CSS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich
  2. No visible forms collecting sensitive data except contact form
  3. No email addresses or phone numbers explicitly listed on the homepage or footer
  4. No social media links detected
  5. Privacy policy is present but cookie policy and terms of service are missing
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  7. Uses WordPress CMS with custom theme
  8. No tracking or analytics scripts detected in provided HTML
  9. Certificates and credit ratings displayed as trust indicators
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress CMS with custom theming and uses Google Fonts for typography. JavaScript is used for UI interactions and asynchronous image loading. The site demonstrates moderate loading performance and good mobile responsiveness. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). However, no advanced frameworks or analytics tools were detected. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to improve accessibility and security configurations. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with proks.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review proks.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.