Skip to main content

Security report for progresio.sk

Progresio Solutions s. r. o. · Technology · Slovakia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Progresio Solutions s. r. o. is a Slovak-based technology service provider specializing in professional web development, custom web applications, e-commerce solutions, and online marketing. Established in 2016, the company targets businesses and individuals seeking tailored digital solutions to enhance their online presence and operational efficiency. Their portfolio and client references indicate a stable market position within Slovakia's digital services sector. Technically, the website is built on WordPress CMS with modern technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, and Google reCAPTCHA for security. Hosting is provided by Wedos, a reputable provider. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, SEO practices, and moderate performance, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, although some HTTP security headers are not detected and could be improved. The site integrates Google Analytics with user consent, aligning with GDPR requirements. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy digital front with strong privacy compliance and business credibility. Strategic recommendations include enhancing HTTP security headers, maintaining up-to-date software, and conducting regular security audits to sustain and improve security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching progresio.sk

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Progresio operates as a small-sized technology service company focused on delivering custom web and digital marketing solutions. Their business model revolves around client projects for website creation, web applications, e-commerce platforms, and online marketing campaigns. The company leverages a skilled team to combine individual expertise for client growth. Market positioning is supported by a portfolio of diverse clients, including local businesses and organizations. Revenue streams likely derive from project-based contracts and ongoing marketing services. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear contact channels and GDPR-compliant policies, indicating operational maturity and customer focus.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and integration of Google reCAPTCHA on forms to prevent automated abuse. Cookie consent is managed via the Complianz GDPR plugin, ensuring compliance with EU regulations. However, the absence of explicit HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options suggests room for improvement in defense-in-depth. No exposed credentials or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and security policy documentation are not publicly available, which is common for small businesses but could be enhanced to improve trust and readiness. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business scale but should evolve with growth.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure HTTP security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) at the server level.
  2. Maintain regular updates of WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  3. Establish and publish a security policy and incident response plan to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  4. Conduct periodic security audits and vulnerability scans to proactively identify and remediate risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search rankings.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Progresio Solutions s. r. o.
VAT number
SK2120819514
Registration number
51856263
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Progresio Solutions s. r. o.
Description
Profesionálna tvorba webových stránok, aplikácií a e-shopov. Spájame individuálne zručnosti a skúsenosti, aby sme pomohli klientom rásť.
Key services
Web stránka (Website development), Webová aplikácia (Web applications), E-shop (E-commerce solutions), Online marketing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.9.10, PHP, jQuery, Bootstrap, Google reCAPTCHA, Complianz GDPR plugin, WPBakery Page Builder
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration on contact form
  • Cookie consent management with Complianz plugin

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Complianz GDPR Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and accessible.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with physical address and contact form.
  4. No evidence of security blocking or WAF challenges.
  5. Uses modern web technologies and WordPress CMS.
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.9.10 with a combination of Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. It uses WPBakery Page Builder for content management and layout. Google reCAPTCHA is integrated for form security, and Google Analytics is configured but only activated upon user consent, reflecting privacy-aware design. Hosting is managed via Wedos nameservers, a known provider. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. The site uses modern CSS and JavaScript libraries but lacks some advanced security headers. The technical stack is appropriate for a small to medium-sized digital services company, with opportunities for modernization in security and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with progresio.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review progresio.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.