Skip to main content

Security report for progetiiger.ee

Haridus- ja Teadusministeerium (EENet) · Education · Estonia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ProgeTiigri.ee is an official educational platform managed by the Estonian Ministry of Education and Research, providing a curated collection of over 100 educational tools and materials focused on programming, robotics, 3D design, and multimedia for teachers and educators. The website serves as a resource hub to support teaching activities with filtering capabilities to find suitable materials. The platform targets primarily educators in Estonia and operates as a government-backed educational resource. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Vue.js, jQuery, and the Foundation CSS framework, with integration of Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for user tracking and analytics. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with a moderate performance profile. Hosting appears to be managed by a government or educational network provider, ensuring stable infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses CSRF tokens in forms, alongside a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR principles. However, it lacks several security headers that could enhance protection against common web threats. No privacy policy or terms of service pages were found, which represents a compliance gap. No explicit contact information or incident response channels are provided, limiting user support and security communication. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained, with strong legitimacy due to government ownership and consistent domain registration. The main risks relate to missing formal privacy and security documentation and absence of security headers. Strategic improvements in these areas would enhance compliance and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching progetiiger.ee

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
75
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform occupies a niche position in the Estonian educational sector, providing digital teaching resources for programming and related STEM fields. Its government backing lends credibility and stable funding, positioning it as a key resource for educators. The business model is non-commercial, focusing on public educational service rather than revenue generation. The target audience is clearly defined as teachers and educational institutions. The partnership with Harno.ee indicates collaboration within the Estonian educational ecosystem. Growth is likely tied to ongoing updates and expansions of educational content. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its official status and curated content tailored to national curricula.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is enforced and CSRF protections are implemented, which are essential baseline controls. The cookie consent mechanism demonstrates awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. Lack of published privacy policy and incident response contacts indicates gaps in compliance and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Overall, the site is secure for typical educational use but would benefit from enhanced security controls and formal documentation to meet higher compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement key security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  4. Provide explicit contact information for security incident reporting and general inquiries.
  5. Regularly review and update cookie consent mechanisms and privacy compliance to align with evolving regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Haridus- ja Teadusministeerium (EENet)
Description
Õpetajatele mõeldud veebipõhisest ProgeTiigri kogumikust leiab vahendeid õppetöös rakendamiseks. Sobivad vahendid saab õpetaja kätte filtreerimise tööriista kasutades. Materjale leiab järgmistest valdkondadest: programmeerimine, robootika, 3D disain, nutiäpid ja multimeedia. Kogumikus on 102 vahendi kirjeldust ja see täieneb iga-aastaselt.
Key services
Educational tools and materials for programming, robotics, 3D design, apps, and multimedia
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Vue.js, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Foundation CSS framework, Selectize.js, Lodash
Frameworks
Foundation
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token present in forms
  • Cookie consent popup with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is an official educational resource managed by the Estonian Ministry of Education and Research
  2. Content is focused on educational tools for programming and related fields
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with clear user options
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the site
  6. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and libraries
  7. No security headers detected, which is a potential improvement area
  8. No signs of WAF or blocking; site content is fully accessible
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and maintainable technology stack with Vue.js for reactive UI components and jQuery for legacy support. Foundation CSS framework ensures responsive design and accessibility. Integration with Google Analytics and Tag Manager supports data-driven insights but requires careful privacy management. The site is hosted likely on government infrastructure, ensuring reliability. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or lightweight backend. The site includes CSRF tokens for form security but lacks advanced security headers. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could be enhanced with additional security and SEO improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with progetiiger.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review progetiiger.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.