Skip to main content

Security report for prodrive-technologies.com

Prodrive Technologies · Technology · Netherlands

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Prodrive Technologies is a well-established company founded in 1993, specializing in the design and manufacturing of high-tech electronics, software, and mechatronic products. The company operates multiple R&D programs and automated manufacturing sites globally, focusing on customer-centric innovation and in-house production to optimize quality and cost. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and clear business positioning in the technology and manufacturing sectors. Technically, the website employs modern tracking and analytics tools such as Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, and Visual Website Optimizer, and uses Cookiebot for cookie consent management. HTTPS is properly enabled, but the absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates room for improvement in security hardening. No privacy policy or terms of service pages were detected, which impacts privacy compliance. No direct contact information or social media links were found in the analyzed content, limiting direct communication channels. Overall, the website and domain registration data support the legitimacy and credibility of the business, but enhancements in security policies and privacy disclosures are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching prodrive-technologies.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Prodrive Technologies holds a strong market position as a technology and manufacturing company with a global footprint. Their business model is B2B, targeting industries requiring advanced electronics and mechatronic solutions. The company leverages in-house production and automation to maintain competitive pricing and quality. The website content and metadata emphasize innovation and societal impact, appealing to industrial clients and partners. The absence of visible contact details and privacy policies suggests a potential area for improving customer engagement and regulatory compliance. The use of multiple analytics and marketing tools indicates a focus on data-driven business insights and user experience optimization.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and bot protection via Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise. Cookie consent is managed through Cookiebot, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the lack of DNSSEC, missing security headers (such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options), and absence of a published security policy or incident response contacts reveal gaps in security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The use of reputable analytics and tracking services is balanced by the need for transparent privacy disclosures. Overall, the security posture is adequate but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and protection standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Publish a security policy and provide incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Review and optimize analytics and tracking configurations to enhance user privacy and transparency.

Contact details published on the site

Registration number
Chamber of Commerce
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Prodrive Technologies
Description
Founded in 1993, Prodrive Technologies designs and manufactures high-tech electronics, software, and mechatronic products and systems. They operate several dedicated R&D programs and three highly automated manufacturing sites as well as sales offices worldwide. The company focuses on customer-centric innovation, in-house production, and optimizing business processes to deliver exceptional price-performance ratio products. Their mission is to contribute to innovations that tackle major societal challenges by creating meaningful technologies.
Key services
High-tech electronics design, Software development, Mechatronic product manufacturing, R&D programs, Automated manufacturing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, Cookiebot, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), Featherlight (lightbox), Google Fonts (Open Sans)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of reCAPTCHA Enterprise for bot protection
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO)
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot with a visible consent dialog.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  4. Multiple analytics and tracking tools are used, including Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, and VWO.
  5. Security best practices are partially implemented; HTTPS is enabled but security headers and DNSSEC are missing.
  6. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links were found in the provided HTML snippet.
  7. The website uses modern fonts and lightbox libraries for UI enhancement.
  8. WHOIS data shows a well-established domain with no privacy protection, consistent with a legitimate business.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, Cookiebot for consent management, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, and Visual Website Optimizer for analytics and user behavior tracking. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts, and UI enhancements include Featherlight lightbox. Hosting is managed via Hostnet as indicated by the nameservers. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph metadata. The absence of a CMS or framework indication suggests a custom or static site architecture. Technical risks include missing DNSSEC and security headers, which should be addressed to improve resilience and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with prodrive-technologies.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review prodrive-technologies.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.