Skip to main content

Security report for prodege.com

Prodege, LLC · Technology · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Prodege, LLC operates a leading consumer marketing and insights platform that empowers marketers, researchers, advertisers, and monetization partners to understand, reach, and grow their customer base. The company leverages innovative technology, consumer-centric insights, and loyalty programs to fuel client success. Positioned as a trusted partner to major global brands and agencies, Prodege offers data-driven solutions with a strong emphasis on quality and speed of insights. The website reflects a mature business with a large-scale operation and a consistent brand presence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries and marketing tools such as HubSpot forms, Google Tag Manager, and Localize.js for multilingual support. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, with comprehensive metadata and structured data enhancing search visibility. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, includes anti-clickjacking measures, and integrates cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. However, it lacks explicit security policies, incident response information, and some recommended security headers. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, indicating a solid security posture but with opportunities for enhancement. Overall, Prodege's website demonstrates high professionalism, trustworthiness, and compliance with privacy regulations. The business appears legitimate and well-established, with strong market positioning and client endorsements. Strategic improvements in security transparency and technical performance could further strengthen its digital maturity and risk management.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching prodege.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
45
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Prodege holds a strong market position as a consumer marketing and insights platform, serving a diverse clientele including researchers, advertisers, and monetization partners. Its business model centers on leveraging loyalty programs and data-driven insights to deliver value to clients. The company benefits from a robust partnership ecosystem with leading global brands and agencies, supported by multiple industry awards and recognitions. Revenue streams likely include insights services, advertising performance solutions, and monetization partnerships. The website content and structure indicate a focus on innovation, client success, and growth, targeting marketing professionals and business decision-makers. The absence of explicit founding year or parent company data suggests an independent operation with a large-scale footprint.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security posture with mandatory HTTPS encryption and anti-clickjacking scripts. Cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, reflecting compliance with privacy laws such as GDPR. The use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms helps mitigate automated abuse. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response plan, and security.txt file limits transparency and preparedness communication. Security headers are minimal, lacking Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security headers that are considered best practices. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were found. Overall, the security maturity is solid but could be improved by publishing formal policies and enhancing HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  2. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  3. Add additional security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide explicit contact channels for security incidents, e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Optimize website performance to improve loading speed and user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Prodege, LLC
Description
Prodege is a leading consumer marketing and insights platform that helps brands understand, reach, and grow their customer base through innovative technology, consumer-centric insights, and always-on white-glove service.
Key services
Consumer insights, Marketing performance, Monetization solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, HubSpot Forms, Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Tiny Slider, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Localize.js
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Anti-clickjacking script present
  • Cookie consent banner with reject/accept options
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
HubSpot Ads Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Localize.js
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich
  2. Strong presence of client testimonials and awards
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  4. Use of modern web technologies and marketing tools
  5. No signs of blocking or WAF interference
  6. Security posture is good but could be improved with additional headers and policies
  7. Contact information primarily via forms and footer links; no explicit phone or physical address found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform, enhanced with modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery, Tiny Slider, and AOS for animations. HubSpot is heavily integrated for forms, analytics, and marketing automation. Google Tag Manager is used for tag management, and Localize.js supports multilingual capabilities. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. SEO is well addressed with Yoast SEO plugin, structured data (JSON-LD), and comprehensive meta tags. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in script loading and caching. The technical stack is mature and supports the business needs effectively, though some technical debt may exist in legacy jQuery usage and multiple third-party scripts.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with prodege.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review prodege.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.