Skip to main content

Security report for privado.ai

Privado · Technology · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and DNS health.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Privado.ai is a technology company specializing in evidence-based privacy governance solutions for software products including web, mobile apps, and backend systems. Positioned as a leader in privacy risk mitigation, Privado offers automated tools for scanning code, monitoring data flows, creating data maps, and generating RoPA reports to help enterprises comply with privacy regulations. The website demonstrates a professional and modern digital presence with a comprehensive product suite targeting enterprise customers concerned with privacy compliance and data governance. Technically, the site leverages modern web technologies such as Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, Intercom, and GSAP animations, ensuring a fast and responsive user experience optimized for mobile devices. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security headers and policies are not published. Privacy compliance indicators are limited on the site, lacking visible privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms, which is a notable gap. Overall, the domain WHOIS data is unavailable due to malformed responses, limiting trust verification from registration data. However, the business information and structured data on the site support legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include publishing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, adding security and incident response disclosures, and improving WHOIS transparency to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain: ms75591043.msv1.invalid

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory
    • High

      Potential Subdomain Takeover

      Subdomain api.privado.ai points to unregistered service p-datamapping-app-1594610122.eu-west-1.elb.amazonaws.com

      What to do: Remove or fix CNAME record to prevent subdomain takeover

      • WSTG-CONF-10
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching privado.ai

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Privado.ai operates in the technology sector with a focus on privacy governance SaaS solutions for enterprises. Their business model is B2B SaaS, offering automated privacy compliance tools that integrate with web, app, and backend software. The company targets privacy leaders and software teams needing real-time data visibility and governance. Market positioning is strong with a clear value proposition around mitigating privacy risks and regulatory fines. The website highlights trusted client logos and social media presence, indicating active engagement and industry recognition. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees for platform access and professional services. Growth indicators include a broad product portfolio and educational resources such as webinars and masterclasses. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed but includes integrations with developer tools. Overall, Privado.ai presents as a credible and growing player in the privacy technology market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data in the HTML content. Use of deferred and asynchronous loading for third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Intercom reduces performance impact and potential security risks. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could be addressed to harden the site against common web attacks. No security policy or incident response information is published, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure programs or security.txt files. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by adopting best practices for headers and public security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  2. Implement and publish a security policy and incident response plan to enhance transparency and trust.
  3. Add security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to improve web security posture.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and publish a security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Improve WHOIS data availability and accuracy to support domain legitimacy and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Privado
Description
Privado assists enterprises in proactively mitigating privacy breaches and fines by scanning code for privacy violations, monitoring data flow and usage, creating data maps, and alerting them on potential breaches
Key services
Web Auditor, App Auditor, Privacy Code Scanning, Dynamic Data Maps, Consent Monitoring, Auto-Risk Discovery, Smart Assessments, Developer Tool Integrations
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Intercom, GSAP, Finsweet Attributes, Revenue Hero Scheduler, Webflow CMS
Platforms
Webflow
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Intercom scripts with defer/async

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Intercom
Marketing tools
Revenue Hero Scheduler
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content
  2. Professional B2B SaaS privacy governance platform
  3. No WHOIS data available to verify domain registration
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found in HTML
  5. Contact info includes company email and physical address
  6. Uses modern web technologies and analytics tools
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  8. No explicit security certifications displayed
  9. No phone numbers found with clear company context
  10. Strong branding and consistent design
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries including GSAP for animations and ScrollTrigger for scroll-based effects. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and Intercom for customer engagement. The site is well-optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, with deferred loading of scripts and optimized images. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph tags, and JSON-LD structured data describing the company and its offerings. The technical infrastructure appears robust with no visible errors or broken elements. Hosting is likely provided by Webflow, ensuring reliable uptime and scalability. Opportunities exist to enhance accessibility features and implement additional security headers to further improve technical maturity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with privado.ai. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review privado.ai.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.