Skip to main content

Security report for privacyhub.lt

Privacy Partners · Technology · Lithuania

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Privacy Partners is a technology-focused company specializing in innovative data protection assessment and compliance solutions targeted at enterprises and data protection specialists. Their website presents a professional and modern interface built with Angular and Material Design, emphasizing ease of use and compliance assurance. The company positions itself as an innovative provider in the data protection compliance market, offering tools that simplify regulatory adherence. Technically, the site leverages modern web technologies and fonts, with good mobile optimization and a secure login form. However, some technical and security enhancements could improve the overall maturity, such as adding security headers and structured data for SEO. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and secure form inputs, but lacks visible advanced security policies or incident response contacts. Overall, the website is trustworthy and functional, though the absence of WHOIS data limits full domain legitimacy verification. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, adding vulnerability disclosure policies, and improving accessibility and SEO.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching privacyhub.lt

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention privacyhub.lt, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
11
Employees
0
Customers
11
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for privacyhub.lt.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, focusing on privacy and data protection compliance tools. Its business model revolves around providing software solutions and assessments to enterprises and data protection professionals. The target audience is clearly defined, and the company appears to maintain consistent branding and professional content. The lack of explicit contact information and certifications suggests a small to medium-sized enterprise. The company maintains a privacy and cookie policy, indicating awareness of regulatory requirements. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the website content. The company’s market position is that of an innovative niche provider in the privacy compliance space, with potential for growth as data protection regulations evolve.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS usage and secure password input fields. However, the absence of HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No visible vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could hinder timely reporting and mitigation of security issues. The site does not expose sensitive data in the HTML content, and no vulnerable libraries were detected. Security best practices could be improved by implementing security headers, publishing a security.txt file, and providing clear security contact channels. The current security score is moderate, reflecting a functional but improvable security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with best practices and improve user experience for all users.
  5. Improve SEO by adding structured data (JSON-LD) and meta tags to increase search engine visibility and indexing.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Privacy Partners
Description
Innovative solutions for enterprises and data protection specialists. Assurance of compliance with simple and effective tools
Key services
data protection assessment, compliance assurance, privacy tools
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular 13, Material Design, Roboto font, Inter font
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by URL)
  • secure password input field

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit exceeded
  3. Site uses modern Angular framework with Material Design
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and linked
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on login page
  6. Login form collects email and password securely with password visibility toggle
  7. No social media links or phone numbers found
  8. No terms of service or security policy pages detected
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  10. Site uses HTTPS as implied by URL and secure input fields
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Angular 13 framework with Material Design components, indicating a modern and maintainable front-end architecture. Fonts used include Roboto and Inter, loaded from Google Fonts. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices with good user experience. Performance is moderate, with no explicit performance optimization indicators found. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the HTML content. The site uses standard form controls with validation and secure password input. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, suggesting minimal user tracking. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in SEO and security headers would enhance the overall technical maturity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with privacyhub.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review privacyhub.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.