Skip to main content

Security report for prinsh.com

Technology · Indonesia

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Prinsh.com is a technology-focused blog primarily targeting Indonesian-speaking audiences, offering tutorials, tips, and hacking-related content. The website is built on the Blogger platform, hosted by Google, and employs HTTPS for secure communication. The content is well-structured with good SEO practices and mobile optimization, making it accessible and user-friendly for its target audience. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and ownership transparency. Security headers are minimal, and there is a lack of formal privacy, terms of service, and contact information pages, which impacts the overall trust and compliance posture. Advertising is managed through Google Adsense, with no advanced tracking or analytics detected beyond this.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching prinsh.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as a niche content provider in the technology sector, focusing on educational and informational content for technology enthusiasts in Indonesia. Its business model revolves around content monetization via advertising. The lack of explicit business contact details and corporate information suggests a small-scale or individual operation. The site maintains consistent branding and regularly updated content, which supports audience engagement. However, the missing WHOIS data and absence of formal policies limit its credibility and may hinder partnerships or growth opportunities.

Security posture

Prinsh.com demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the lack of comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options indicates room for improvement. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or incident response contact reduces preparedness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is moderately secure but would benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add explicit cookie consent mechanisms to align with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Enhance security headers to include Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide clear contact information including business emails and incident response contacts.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS registration data to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Prinsh.com Adalah Blog Yang Membahas Seputar Teknologi, Tutorial, Tips & Tricks, Hacking, Dan Info Menarik Lainnya!
Key services
Technology tips, Tutorials, Hacking information, Tech news and tricks
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Blogger platform, Google Fonts, Google Adsense, JavaScript, CSS3
Platforms
Blogger
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible sensitive data exposure
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a technology blog in Indonesian language with good content quality.
  2. No explicit privacy, terms, or contact pages found.
  3. Uses Blogger platform hosted by Google with HTTPS enabled.
  4. No WHOIS registration data available, which is unusual.
  5. No security incident or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  6. Cookie policy banner present but lacks explicit consent mechanism.
  7. No business contact emails or phone numbers found.
  8. No social media links explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  9. Advertising via Google Adsense is present.
  10. No advanced analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond Adsense.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages the Blogger platform, which provides a stable and scalable hosting environment. It uses modern web technologies including CSS3 and JavaScript, with Google Fonts for typography and Google Adsense for monetization. The site is mobile responsive and optimized for SEO with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, typical for Blogger-hosted sites. There is no evidence of advanced frameworks or custom backend technologies. Technical debt appears low, but the site could benefit from improved accessibility features and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with prinsh.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review prinsh.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.