Skip to main content

Security report for primuserp.com

SIA "Primus ERP" · Technology · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

31/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Primus ERP Ltd. is a Latvia-based small technology company specializing in end-to-end SAP ERP solutions, particularly focused on financial modules such as SAP FI/CO, FI-CA, and Shared Service Framework for Financials. The company targets businesses seeking to optimize their enterprise resource planning and financial management processes through SAP implementations. The website reflects a niche market positioning with a B2B business model centered on SAP consulting and software services. Technically, the website is built on an older WordPress platform with legacy jQuery and uses plugins like Yoast SEO and Google Analytics for SEO and analytics purposes. The site lacks HTTPS encryption and modern security headers, which impacts its security posture negatively. Performance and mobile optimization are basic, and the design is functional but dated. Security-wise, the absence of HTTPS, privacy policies, and cookie consent mechanisms are significant gaps, especially given the use of Google Analytics. No incident response or security contact information is provided, and the site uses outdated software versions, increasing risk exposure. The domain registration data is consistent with the business information, indicating legitimacy. Overall, the website presents moderate business credibility but requires urgent improvements in security and privacy compliance to reduce risk and enhance trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching primuserp.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
31

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Primus ERP operates in the technology sector, providing specialized SAP ERP financial solutions. Its competitive advantage lies in focused expertise on SAP FI/CO and FI-CA modules and shared service frameworks. The business model is B2B consulting and software services targeting enterprises needing SAP ERP implementations. The company appears stable with a domain age of over 10 years and verified registration in Latvia. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter supports marketing and client engagement. However, the website's dated technical infrastructure and lack of modern security and privacy features may hinder growth and client trust. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data.

Security posture

The website's security maturity is low due to lack of HTTPS, missing security headers, and absence of privacy and cookie policies. Use of outdated WordPress and jQuery versions increases vulnerability risk. No visible incident response or security contact channels reduce preparedness for security events. The presence of Google Analytics without consent mechanisms raises compliance concerns under GDPR. While domain registration is legitimate and stable, the technical security posture requires significant enhancement to protect data and build trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all website traffic.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies and implement a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR.
  3. Update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to the latest versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Establish and publish incident response contact information and security policies to improve transparency and readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
PRIMUS ERP Ltd.
VAT number
LV 40103638483
Registration number
40103638483
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA "Primus ERP"
Description
Provides end-to-end SAP ERP solutions including SAP FI/CO, FI-CA, and Shared Service Framework for Financials to optimize enterprise resource planning and financial management.
Key services
SAP FI/CO integration, SAP FI-CA contract accounts receivable and payable, SAP Shared Service Framework for Financials
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress 4.9.26, jQuery 1.12.4, Yoast SEO plugin v11.7, Google Analytics, Cufon font replacement
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
30/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited to prevent unauthorized transfers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, ShareThis
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTP only, no HTTPS detected
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found despite use of Google Analytics
  3. Contact information is present but no phone number found
  4. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter
  5. Website built on older WordPress version (4.9.26) with outdated jQuery
  6. No visible security headers or advanced security measures
  7. Content is relevant but design and UX are basic and dated
  8. No forms collecting personal data except search form
  9. No visible incident response or security contact information
Technical notes

Notes

The website runs on WordPress 4.9.26 with jQuery 1.12.4, both outdated and potentially vulnerable. SEO is enhanced using Yoast SEO plugin v11.7, and Google Analytics is used for traffic monitoring. The site uses Cufon for font rendering, an older technology. Hosting details indicate EuroDNS S.A. as registrar with DNS servers at garmtech.com. The site lacks HTTPS, which is a critical technical deficiency. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility. The technical debt is evident in legacy software and missing modern security practices, posing risks to business continuity and user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with primuserp.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review primuserp.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.