Skip to main content

Security report for priice.net

Priice.NET · Technology · France

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Priice.NET is a technology company specializing in providing shopping solutions such as Where To Buy, Price Watcher, Store Locator, Review Tracker, and Premium Affiliate solutions targeted at brands, editors, distributors, and agencies internationally. Founded in 2011, the company positions itself as an established player in the e-commerce technology sector with a focus on improving online and offline strategies for its clients. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings and trusted client logos, indicating a credible market presence. Technically, the website employs modern frontend technologies including Bootstrap 4, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, and data visualization libraries like D3.js and Datamaps. Hosting is provided by OVH sas, a reputable provider, and the site loads with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic, and no CMS is detected. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and published security policies. There is no privacy or cookie policy, nor any incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which are compliance and security gaps. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for tracking without visible consent mechanisms, indicating privacy compliance issues. Overall, the website is functional and professional but requires improvements in privacy compliance, security best practices, and transparency to enhance trust and meet regulatory requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching priice.net

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
53
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention priice.net, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
4
Employees
0
Customers
4
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for priice.net.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Priice.NET operates in the technology and e-commerce sectors, offering SaaS and affiliate solutions primarily to brands and distributors. Its competitive advantage lies in providing turnkey shopping solutions that require minimal development effort, supported by real-time data crawling and international coverage. The business model includes subscription-based services and affiliate revenue streams. The presence of well-known clients like Alcatel and Blackberry suggests established partnerships and market credibility. Growth indicators include a broad product portfolio and international reach. The company appears to maintain a lean structure with no public subsidiaries or parent company affiliations.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website enforces HTTPS but lacks critical security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies, consent mechanisms, and incident response contacts indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file reduces transparency and incident readiness. Overall, the security culture appears basic and would benefit from formalized policies and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with explicit consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Establish and publish an incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure program with clear contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  4. Conduct a privacy impact assessment and update tracking practices to minimize user data collection and improve transparency.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities and improve performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Priice.NET
Description
Priice.NET provides shopping solutions including Where To Buy, Price Watcher, Store Locator, Review Tracker, and Premium Affiliate solutions to brands, editors, and distributors internationally.
Key services
Where To Buy, Price Watcher, Review Tracker, Store Locator, Premium Affiliate solution
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 4, Font Awesome, Google Fonts (Open Sans), jQuery (implied by Bootstrap 4 usage), D3.js, TopoJSON, Datamaps
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is only via contact form; no explicit emails or phone numbers found.
  4. No security or incident response policies published.
  5. Website uses modern frontend technologies and external trusted CDNs.
  6. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for tracking without visible consent mechanism.
  7. WHOIS data is consistent and domain is well maintained.
  8. No suspicious or malicious indicators detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern frontend stack leveraging Bootstrap 4 for responsive design, Font Awesome for icons, and Google Fonts for typography. Data visualization is handled by D3.js and Datamaps, indicating a focus on interactive and graphical content. Hosting is managed by OVH sas, a reputable provider, with domain registration dating back to 2011. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, especially in SEO and accessibility. No CMS or backend technologies were identified from the HTML content. The site uses external CDNs for libraries, which aids in performance but requires monitoring for security. Technical risks include lack of security headers and missing privacy compliance features that could impact business operations and regulatory adherence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with priice.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review priice.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.