Skip to main content

Security report for prezi.com

Prezi · Technology · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

84/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Prezi is a well-established technology company specializing in AI-enhanced presentation software designed to engage audiences effectively. Founded in 2000, Prezi offers a SaaS platform targeting business professionals, educators, and students, providing key services such as video presentations, interactive presentations, and infographic design tools. The company holds a strong market position as a leader in interactive presentation technology with a large user base and major corporate customers. Technically, Prezi's website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure hosted on AWS, built with modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, JavaScript frameworks, and integrated marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and Optimizely. The site is fast, mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, reflecting a high level of digital maturity. From a security perspective, Prezi maintains a robust posture with HTTPS enforcement, SOC 2 compliance, and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, minor improvements such as enabling DNSSEC and publishing a security.txt file could enhance security transparency and DNS security. Overall, Prezi presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility, technical sophistication, and compliance adherence. Strategic recommendations include enhancing incident response visibility, publishing vulnerability disclosure information, and enabling DNSSEC to further strengthen trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching prezi.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
84

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention prezi.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
551,244
Employees
14
Customers
551,162
Third parties
68
Weak passwords
17%

Latest record dated 2026-05-28 · 22 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for prezi.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –prezi.com2026-05-28
  • –prezi.com2026-05-26
  • –prezi.com2026-05-26
  • –prezi.com2026-05-19
  • –prezi.com2026-05-19

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Prezi operates in the technology and education sectors, leveraging a SaaS subscription model to deliver AI-powered presentation tools. Its competitive advantage lies in interactive and AI-driven content creation, appealing to a broad audience from individual users to large enterprises and educational institutions. Revenue streams primarily come from subscription plans tailored for individuals, businesses, and educational users. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem, integrating with platforms like Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Webex. Growth indicators include continuous product innovation and a global user base. Prezi's strategic focus on hybrid work solutions and educational engagement positions it well in evolving market trends.

Security posture

Prezi exhibits a mature security posture with SOC 2 certification and continuous system monitoring. The website enforces HTTPS and implements key security headers, reducing common web vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is strong, with clear policies and cookie consent aligned with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of a published security.txt and explicit incident response contacts indicates room for improvement in transparency and vulnerability management. No evidence of security incidents or exposed sensitive data was found, suggesting effective internal controls. The company should consider enhancing its incident response readiness and public communication channels to further solidify its security culture.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the prezi.com domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a security.txt file at the root domain to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  3. Provide explicit incident response contact information (e.g., security@prezi.com) on the website.
  4. Consider publishing Data Protection Officer contact details to enhance GDPR transparency.
  5. Maintain and regularly update privacy and cookie policies to reflect evolving compliance requirements.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Prezi
Description
Prezi is a presentation software company that helps users create engaging, interactive presentations, videos, and infographics with AI assistance. It targets professionals, educators, and businesses to improve communication and presentation effectiveness.
Key services
Prezi Video, Prezi Presentations, Prezi Design (Infographics)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Typekit Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Optimizely
Frameworks
Webflow (CMS and site builder)
Platforms
AWS (hosting and DNS)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • SOC 2 compliance
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Optimizely
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Strong privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms implemented.
  3. SOC 2 certification indicates good security posture.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed; contact primarily via forms.
  5. Modern technology stack with good performance and mobile optimization.
  6. No evidence of vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  7. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure page found.
  8. DNSSEC not enabled, which is a minor security improvement opportunity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Webflow CMS, JavaScript, and Typekit fonts, hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure. It integrates marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and Optimizely for performance optimization and user experience enhancement. The site demonstrates fast loading times, excellent mobile responsiveness, and good accessibility features. SEO is well implemented with comprehensive meta tags and Open Graph data. Minor technical risks include the lack of DNSSEC and absence of a security.txt file. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports robust business operations with scalability and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 84/100Low22 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with prezi.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review prezi.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.