Skip to main content

Security report for practiproject.com

practiproject.com · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Practiproject.com is a technology service provider specializing in improving work processes for R&D companies and organizations, particularly those using Atlassian products. With over a decade of experience, they offer customizations, data center implementations, migrations, software upgrades, and technical professional services. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and Elementor, featuring clear navigation, international contact numbers, and social media presence. The technical infrastructure includes modern tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Drift chat for marketing and customer engagement. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and some security hardening, but lacks published security policies and cookie consent mechanisms. WHOIS data is missing, which raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching practiproject.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Practiproject positions itself as a niche technology service provider focused on Atlassian customers and R&D organizations. Their competitive advantage lies in extensive experience with customizations and technical solutions, targeting medium to small enterprises globally. The business model is service-oriented, generating revenue through consulting, software upgrades, and agile transformation services. The company maintains an active partnership ecosystem via social media but lacks visible certifications or formal security accreditations. Growth indicators include a decade-long presence and a portfolio of hundreds of customers. Strategic observations suggest the company should improve domain registration transparency and enhance privacy compliance to strengthen market trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and use of security hardening plugins. However, it lacks critical security headers and does not publish a security policy or incident response contacts, which are important for compliance and trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. GDPR compliance is partially addressed through a privacy policy but lacks cookie consent mechanisms. Incident response readiness appears minimal due to absence of published contacts. Overall, the security culture is basic and would benefit from formalizing policies and improving transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish a detailed security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve trust and legitimacy.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
practiproject.com
Description
We have been improving the work process of R&D companies and organizations for more than a decade using state-of-the-art methodologies and integrated technologies. Need kick-ass customizations, Data Center implementation or Migration, Software upgrades or support? We do it all! The expertise from hundreds of customizations and on-boarding projects provides PractiProject with a strong competence on Technical Professional Services and Solutions.
Key services
Customizations, Data Center implementation, Migration, Software upgrades, Technical professional services, Agile transformation, Cyber security
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Drift chat
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data found
  • Use of security hardening plugin (wp-security-hardening)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Drift chat
Marketing tools
Drift chat
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected
  2. Professional design using WordPress and Elementor
  3. Clear contact information with multiple international phone numbers
  4. Presence of privacy policy and terms of service pages
  5. No cookie consent mechanism detected
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, raising questions about domain registration status
  8. Use of Google Analytics and Google Ads for marketing and tracking
  9. Social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn
  10. No visible forms on homepage; contact likely via contact page or phone/email
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with Elementor page builder, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and Google services for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with Yoast SEO plugin. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility features. The technical stack is current but depends heavily on third-party scripts which should be monitored for security risks. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Technical debt appears low but could be reduced by optimizing scripts and implementing advanced caching and security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with practiproject.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review practiproject.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.