Skip to main content

Security report for ppdbkedirikota.id

PPDB Kota Kediri Persyaratan, Jalur, dan Tips Sukses Masuk Sekolah Favorit · Education · Indonesia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'PPDB Kota Kediri Persyaratan, Jalur, dan Tips Sukses Masuk Sekolah Favorit' serves as an educational information portal focused on student admissions in Kediri city, Indonesia. It provides guidance, news, and tips related to school admissions, targeting students, parents, and local educational stakeholders. The site is built on WordPress with common plugins and uses Cloudflare DNS services. The content is well structured, recent, and relevant to its audience, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. However, the site lacks critical privacy and cookie policies, contact information, and security headers, which impacts its compliance and security posture. The domain WHOIS data shows inconsistencies with a future creation date and registrant being a registrar company, which slightly lowers trust but does not indicate malicious intent. Overall, the website is functional and informative but requires improvements in privacy, security, and transparency to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ppdbkedirikota.id

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as a small-scale informational platform in the education sector, focusing on local student admission processes in Kediri city. It leverages WordPress CMS and targets a regional audience of students and parents. The business model is content-driven without evident monetization or advertising. The site links extensively to other Indonesian government and educational domains, indicating a network of related informational resources. The lack of direct business registrant data and contact details suggests a possible informal or community-driven operation rather than a formal corporate entity. Growth potential lies in expanding content, adding interactive features, and improving compliance and security to build credibility.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and Cloudflare DNS, providing a baseline of transport security. However, it lacks DNSSEC, security headers, and visible incident response or security policies. No forms with sensitive data collection were detected, reducing immediate risk exposure. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and similar regulations. The WHOIS data anomaly with future domain creation date and registrar-only registrant information warrants monitoring but is not an immediate threat. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements in policy transparency, DNS security, and HTTP security headers to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for user support and incident reporting.
  3. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  4. Configure HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Establish an incident response policy and provide security contact channels to improve security readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PPDB Kota Kediri Persyaratan, Jalur, dan Tips Sukses Masuk Sekolah Favorit
Description
Website providing information about PPDB (student admission) in Kediri city including requirements, admission paths, and tips for entering favorite schools.
Key services
Educational admission guidance, Local education news, School admission tips
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Yoast SEO, Slick Carousel, FontAwesome, Cloudflare DNS
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status serverTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based educational information portal focused on student admissions in Kediri city.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided.
  4. No security or incident response policies visible.
  5. Website uses HTTPS and Cloudflare DNS but lacks DNSSEC and security headers.
  6. Content is in Indonesian language and well structured with recent posts dated October 2025.
  7. Many external links to other Indonesian local government and educational domains.
  8. No advertising or analytics scripts detected beyond basic WordPress and theme scripts.
  9. No adult or unsafe content detected.
  10. WHOIS data shows domain registered by a registrar company with future creation date, indicating possible data anomaly.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 with common plugins like Yoast SEO, jQuery, Slick Carousel, and FontAwesome. It uses Cloudflare DNS servers but does not have DNSSEC enabled. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate with no obvious broken elements. The domain WHOIS data shows a future creation date which is unusual and may indicate pre-registration or data error. No advanced frameworks beyond WordPress were detected. The site lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features, representing technical debt and modernization opportunities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ppdbkedirikota.id. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ppdbkedirikota.id.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.