Skip to main content

Security report for poslovnaspajalica.hr

Poslovna Spajalica d.o.o. · Technology · Croatia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Poslovna Spajalica d.o.o. is a Croatian IT solutions provider focused on delivering innovative technology services including custom software development, cybersecurity, digital transformation, and computer maintenance. The company targets modern enterprises seeking to enhance their business operations through technology. Their market position appears to be that of a small to medium-sized local IT service provider with a professional online presence. The website demonstrates a moderate level of digital maturity, utilizing modern web technologies such as React and JavaScript, with a responsive design and clear navigation. However, some content areas like testimonials contain placeholder text, indicating incomplete content. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS assumed but lacking explicit security headers and policies. Privacy compliance is basic with a cookie consent banner but no visible privacy or terms of service pages. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could improve in security and compliance transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching poslovnaspajalica.hr

This scan found 22 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
75
GDPR outside view
10
Average
52

Not counted

  • Network security: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, providing a range of IT services including cybersecurity, cloud migration, and business intelligence. Their business model is service-oriented, targeting businesses requiring IT infrastructure and digital transformation. The presence of social media links on LinkedIn, X (Twitter), and GitHub suggests engagement with professional and developer communities. The company provides clear contact information and legal registration details, enhancing credibility. However, the lack of detailed privacy and security policies and incomplete testimonial content may limit trust for some users. No parent or subsidiary companies are indicated, suggesting an independent small business operation.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, there is no evidence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, or X-Frame-Options, which are best practices to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder timely reporting and resolution of security issues. The cookie consent mechanism is present, indicating some attention to privacy compliance. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, reducing privacy risks but also limiting insights into user behavior. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing security headers, publishing security policies, and establishing incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common attacks.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and terms of service policies to improve transparency and GDPR compliance.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to facilitate security issue reporting.
  4. Complete the testimonials section with real client feedback to strengthen trust signals.
  5. Conduct a security audit of SSL/TLS configuration and ensure strong cipher suites and protocols are used.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Poslovna Spajalica d.o.o.
Registration number
MBS: 070091737
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Poslovna Spajalica d.o.o.
Description
Innovative IT Solutions for Modern Enterprises
Key services
Custom Development, Cyber Security, Digital Transformation, Computer Maintenance, Data Management, Cloud Migration, Network Solutions, Business Intelligence
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, JavaScript, CSS
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS assumed (not explicitly confirmed)
  • Cookie consent banner present

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible and professional
  2. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with email, phone, and physical address
  5. No security policy or incident response information available
  6. No visible security headers or advanced security configurations detected
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected except a single external script from cdn.gpteng.co
  8. Social media presence includes LinkedIn, X (Twitter), and GitHub
  9. Testimonials section contains placeholder text, indicating incomplete content
  10. Footer contains detailed company registration information
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies, primarily React with JavaScript modules and CSS for styling. The site is mobile responsive and has a clean, professional design. Performance appears moderate with no obvious blocking scripts or heavy resources. No CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly detected. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags for description and author but no structured data or JSON-LD detected. The site includes external links to social media and uses a third-party script from cdn.gpteng.co, which should be reviewed for security and privacy compliance. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced SEO and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with poslovnaspajalica.hr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review poslovnaspajalica.hr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.