Skip to main content

Security report for ports.domains

Domaininfo AB · Technology · Sweden

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Domaininfo AB operates as a domain registrar specializing in registering domain names across multiple top-level domains globally. The company is currently transitioning its services to a new platform called Abion Core, indicating a strategic shift or upgrade in their service delivery. Their market position is that of a specialized registrar with a focus on trademark clearinghouse monitoring and domain transfer services. The website is professionally designed, targeting businesses and individuals seeking domain registration services, primarily in Sweden. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript frameworks and Google Analytics for tracking, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit GDPR compliance statements. The WHOIS data is missing or indicates the domain may be unregistered or expired, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy despite the professional website presence. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy but requires attention to domain registration status and enhanced security and privacy policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  4. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Domain Expires Soon

      Domain expires in 14 days

      What to do: Renew domain registration before expiration

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ports.domains

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Domaininfo AB's business model revolves around domain registration and management, serving a niche market of domain registrants and trademark owners. The company leverages partnerships, such as with Abion for platform migration and support services via www.support.se, to enhance customer experience. Their revenue streams likely include domain registration fees, renewals, and trademark monitoring services. The presence of social media channels and a clear contact infrastructure supports customer engagement and trust. The announcement of service closure and migration suggests a business transition phase, which may impact customer retention and operational continuity. The company operates in the technology sector, specifically in internet services, with a small company size based in Sweden.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No explicit incident response or security policy pages are found, and there is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure or security certifications. The missing WHOIS data and domain registration inconsistencies pose a risk to trustworthiness and may indicate administrative or operational issues. Data protection practices appear basic, with privacy policies available only as PDFs and no clear GDPR compliance statements. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident from the website content.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Provide clear, accessible privacy and security policies on the website with explicit GDPR compliance statements to improve privacy compliance.
  3. Establish and publish incident response contact information and procedures to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Clarify domain registration status and ensure WHOIS information is accurate and publicly available to strengthen legitimacy and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Domaininfo AB
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Domaininfo AB
Description
Domaininfo registers domain names in all countries possible as well as in the international top level domains .com, .net .org, .biz, .info .name and others.
Key services
Domain name registration, Domain transfer services, Trademark Clearinghouse monitoring
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Analytics, Knockout.js (data-bind attributes), Google Maps API
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected
  2. WHOIS data is missing, indicating domain may be unregistered or expired
  3. Website announces closure and migration to new platform Abion Core
  4. Contact information is complete and professional
  5. Cookie consent banner is present and functional
  6. No privacy or security policy pages explicitly found except PDF documents
  7. Use of Google Analytics for tracking
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
  9. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn
  10. Website uses HTTPS and modern JavaScript frameworks
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom CMS platform utilizing JavaScript frameworks such as Knockout.js and integrates Google Analytics and Google Maps APIs. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata. Performance is moderate with no evident critical errors or broken elements. However, the lack of explicit security headers and limited accessibility features indicate areas for technical improvement. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The site uses HTTPS, which is a positive security indicator. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but would benefit from modernization in security and accessibility aspects.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ports.domains. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ports.domains.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.