Skip to main content

Security report for poper.ai

Poper · Technology · India

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Poper is a technology company specializing in AI-powered onsite engagement tools such as smart popups, widgets, notifications, and gamification features designed to enhance user interaction and increase conversion rates for websites and e-commerce platforms. The company positions itself as a modern SaaS provider serving over 2000 brands, focusing on delivering personalized and dynamic engagement solutions. The website is professionally designed with excellent content quality, clear navigation, and strong branding consistency, targeting website owners and marketers seeking to boost engagement and sales. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including React and Next.js, ensuring fast performance, mobile optimization, and good SEO practices. The presence of structured data and social media integration further enhances its digital maturity. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, employs standard security headers, and avoids exposing sensitive data, reflecting a solid security posture. However, explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly available, which could be improved. Overall, the website and business demonstrate a high level of professionalism and trustworthiness, with privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms in place indicating compliance with GDPR. The WHOIS data is privacy protected but shows no suspicious patterns, consistent with a legitimate tech startup. The risk profile is low, with recommendations to enhance transparency around security and incident response. Strategic recommendations include publishing a dedicated security policy, establishing a vulnerability disclosure program, and providing direct security contact information to strengthen trust and compliance further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching poper.ai

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Poper operates in the competitive AI-driven marketing technology sector, offering innovative onsite engagement solutions that differentiate through AI personalization and dynamic content adaptation. Its SaaS business model targets SMEs and e-commerce businesses globally, leveraging affiliate programs and social media marketing to expand reach. The company’s ecosystem includes integrations with major platforms like Shopify and WordPress, enhancing its market penetration. Growth indicators include a client base of 2000+ brands and active social media presence. The lack of detailed financial or founding year data limits deeper business intelligence but the professional web presence and customer logos suggest a stable and growing operation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforcement and multiple security headers such as HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and Content-Security-Policy. No exposed sensitive information or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and include consent mechanisms, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of a public security policy, incident response plan, or security contact emails represents a compliance gap and potential risk in incident handling readiness. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file was found, limiting transparency for security researchers. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing security governance and communication channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and controls.
  2. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Provide direct security contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Enhance incident response readiness by documenting procedures and communication channels.
  5. Maintain and regularly update privacy and cookie policies to reflect evolving regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Poper
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Poper
Description
Poper is an AI-powered onsite engagement platform designed to enhance user interactions, increase retention, and boost conversion rates. It offers a comprehensive suite of tools including popups, dynamic widgets, notifications, vidget, and nudges.
Key services
AI-powered popups, Dynamic widgets, Notifications, Lead generation tools, Gamification features
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, JavaScript, CSS, Google Fonts, Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is rich, professional, and well-structured
  3. Strong use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  4. WHOIS data is privacy protected but no red flags found
  5. No direct security contact or incident response info found
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and comprehensive
  7. Social media presence is active and consistent with brand
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React and Next.js framework, ensuring server-side rendering and fast load times. It uses Google Fonts and external CDNs for assets, optimizing performance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph, Twitter cards, and JSON-LD structured data. The use of Facebook Pixel indicates marketing analytics integration. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or headless architecture. Hosting provider details are not explicit but the presence of Identity Digital in WHOIS suggests domain registration through a reputable registrar. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust, scalable, and aligned with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with poper.ai. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review poper.ai.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.