Skip to main content

Security report for pompomsoft.de

InvitedToHell · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website pompomsoft.de represents a personal or small-scale developer presence primarily focused on social and gaming community engagement. The site features links to social media platforms such as Telegram, GitHub, and Mastodon, and includes a 3D interactive element powered by Spline. There is no formal business description or corporate information provided, indicating an individual or hobbyist operation rather than a commercial enterprise. The technical infrastructure leverages modern frontend technologies including Svelte and Cloudflare DNS services, suggesting a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the site lacks comprehensive metadata, privacy policies, and security headers, which limits its compliance and security posture. The absence of forms or data collection mechanisms reduces privacy risks but also limits business functionality. Overall, the site is accessible and functional but basic in content and security features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pompomsoft.de

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pompomsoft.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for pompomsoft.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The entity behind pompomsoft.de appears to be an individual or small developer known as 'InvitedToHell', with a focus on social and gaming communities rather than a formal business. The market positioning is niche and personal, with no clear revenue streams or business model evident. The target audience is general internet users interested in gaming and social interaction. The lack of business credentials, certifications, or formal contact information suggests limited commercial operations. The partnership ecosystem is limited to social platforms and community sites. Growth indicators and strategic business insights are not discernible from the available data.

Security posture

The website's security posture is basic with no explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or certifications found. The use of Cloudflare DNS provides some level of protection and performance enhancement, but no security headers or HTTPS enforcement details were identified in the provided data. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, but the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, particularly with GDPR. Incident response readiness appears minimal due to lack of dedicated contacts. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, suitable for a personal site but insufficient for commercial or sensitive data handling.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a privacy policy and cookie policy to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance security posture.
  3. Ensure HTTPS is enforced site-wide and verify SSL/TLS configuration for best practices.
  4. Establish clear incident response contact channels, such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Improve accessibility and SEO metadata to enhance user experience and discoverability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
InvitedToHell
Description
Personal or individual developer/presence with links to social and gaming profiles; no explicit business description
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
SvelteKit, Spline Viewer, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Svelte
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal or small developer presence with social and gaming community links
  2. No formal business or corporate information provided
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms policies found
  4. No forms or data collection mechanisms detected
  5. No security policies or incident response contacts found
  6. Modern frontend technology (Svelte) used with 3D Spline viewer integration
  7. No analytics or advertising detected
  8. No security headers or explicit SSL info available from provided data
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend framework (Svelte) and integrates a 3D Spline viewer for interactive content. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, which provides performance and security benefits. The site loads multiple JavaScript modules with modulepreload hints, indicating an optimized loading strategy. However, no CMS or backend platform is detected, suggesting a static or client-side rendered site. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization but basic accessibility features. SEO optimization is minimal with no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data present. There is no evidence of analytics or tracking services, which reduces privacy concerns but also limits marketing insights.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pompomsoft.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pompomsoft.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.