Skip to main content

Security report for plus.ba

Plus · Technology · Bosnia and Herzegovina

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Plus.ba is a regional e-commerce platform based in Bosnia and Herzegovina specializing in technology and consumer electronics products. The website offers a broad catalog including laptops, mobile phones, computer components, peripherals, and household appliances, targeting general consumers and technology buyers in the region. The business model is focused on online retail with additional B2B services accessible via a partner domain. The site demonstrates consistent branding and a professional online presence with active social media channels and user engagement features such as product comparison and favorites. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including Bootstrap, Font Awesome, jQuery, and various JavaScript libraries for UI components and analytics. It uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and integrates tracking tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. Mobile optimization and navigation clarity are good, though accessibility features are basic. SEO optimization is present but could be improved with more comprehensive metadata and structured data. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data in the HTML. However, it lacks several important security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, and does not provide a vulnerability disclosure policy or dedicated security contact channels. Privacy and cookie policies are not found, indicating gaps in GDPR compliance and user privacy transparency. No WAF or blocking mechanisms are detected, and the site content is fully accessible. Overall, Plus.ba presents a moderately strong business and technical profile with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security best practices. The domain WHOIS data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include publishing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, implementing security headers, and establishing vulnerability disclosure and incident response contacts to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching plus.ba

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention plus.ba, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
321
Employees
0
Customers
243
Third parties
78
Weak passwords
15%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for plus.ba.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Plus.ba holds a solid position as a technology and electronics retailer in Bosnia and Herzegovina, leveraging a broad product catalog and online sales channels. Its competitive advantage lies in offering a wide range of products from laptops to household appliances, supported by features like product comparison and favorites. The business model is primarily B2C e-commerce with a B2B extension via plusline.ba. Revenue streams are likely driven by direct product sales and possibly partnerships. The target customer segment includes general consumers and tech enthusiasts in the region. The company maintains an active social media presence and uses modern marketing and analytics tools, indicating a focus on digital growth and customer engagement. The partnership ecosystem includes related domains like plusline.ba for B2B services. Overall, the company appears well-positioned for regional market growth but should enhance compliance and security to strengthen market trust.

Security posture

The security maturity of Plus.ba is moderate. The site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration, which is fundamental for secure communications. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options exposes the site to potential risks like clickjacking and MIME sniffing. There is no published vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file, and no dedicated security contact emails are provided, which limits incident response readiness. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. The use of third-party tracking pixels and analytics is extensive, but privacy compliance mechanisms are weak. No signs of malware, phishing, or WAF blocking were detected. To improve security posture, the company should implement recommended headers, publish privacy and cookie policies, establish clear security incident contacts, and consider a vulnerability disclosure program.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  3. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file with dedicated security contact information.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure privacy compliance and minimize user tracking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Plus
Description
Plus.ba is an e-commerce platform specializing in technology and consumer electronics products including laptops, mobile phones, computer components, peripherals, and household appliances. It offers a wide range of products with categories such as laptops, mobile devices, components, gaming, networking, printers, and more.
Key services
Online product sales, Product comparison, Favorites and wishlists, Advanced search, B2B services via plusline.ba
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap CSS, Font Awesome, jQuery, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Select2, Modernizr, Slick Carousel, Remodal, NoUISlider, Magnific Popup, Revolution Slider
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of secure cookies (implied)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Google Ads (AW-972367957)
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a regional e-commerce platform focused on technology and electronics.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page.
  3. Social media presence on Facebook and Twitter is active and linked.
  4. Uses modern web technologies and tracking tools but lacks some security headers.
  5. No visible security incident contact or vulnerability disclosure.
  6. Content is professional and well-structured with good navigation and mobile optimization.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; content fully accessible.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected; safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern front-end stack using Bootstrap for responsive design, Font Awesome for icons, and various JavaScript libraries for UI enhancements such as sliders, modals, and carousels. Analytics and marketing integrations include Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Google Ads conversion tracking. The site loads multiple external resources from trusted CDNs and uses HTTPS throughout. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, particularly in loading times and accessibility. The CMS or backend platform is not explicitly identified, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation clarity and professional design. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of documented privacy and security policies, which could impact compliance and user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 60/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with plus.ba. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review plus.ba.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.