Skip to main content

Security report for pluro.ai

Domains By Proxy, LLC · Technology · United States

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

84/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pluro.ai is a newly established technology company founded in 2024, specializing in web accessibility solutions. Their platform offers instant WCAG compliance checks, issue fixing tools, and ongoing accessibility monitoring aimed primarily at web developers and businesses seeking to improve website accessibility. The company positions itself as a niche SaaS provider focused on simplifying compliance with accessibility standards such as WCAG and ADA. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern frameworks like Bootstrap and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and ContentSquare. The hosting infrastructure is based on AWS, ensuring reliable performance and scalability. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced, domain locking, and cookie consent mechanisms, though DNSSEC is not enabled and some advanced security headers are missing. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies that align with GDPR requirements. No direct contact emails or phone numbers are published, with contact primarily via web forms. Overall, the website is professional, accessible, and trustworthy, with a good balance of technical maturity and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pluro.ai

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
84

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Pluro operates in the technology sector, targeting web developers and enterprises needing accessibility compliance solutions. Their SaaS business model includes free trials and subscription plans, leveraging a user portal at my.pluro.ai. The company benefits from a clear market niche with growing demand for accessibility tools driven by legal and ethical requirements. Their marketing ecosystem includes HubSpot and social media tracking, supporting lead generation and customer engagement. The new domain registration and privacy protection are consistent with a startup profile. The absence of explicit contact details may limit direct trust signals but is mitigated by professional content and compliance documentation. Strategic partnerships or subsidiaries were not identified, but the dedicated user portal domain indicates a service ecosystem.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS, domain status locks, and cookie consent. Use of Google reCAPTCHA and absence of exposed sensitive data enhance security. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt reduces transparency for security researchers. Third-party scripts from analytics and marketing providers introduce potential risk vectors that require ongoing monitoring. Overall, the security posture is appropriate for a small SaaS provider but could be improved with additional headers and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Add additional HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Domains By Proxy, LLC
Description
A unique accessibility platform for web developers that will make youSave accessibility work time by 75%Expand offering and increase incomeCreate great accessibility beyond compliance (Of course, we’re WCAG & ADA compliant)
Key services
Instant website accessibility check, WCAG compliance reporting, Issue fixing tools (no-code/low-code), Accessibility monitoring
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.5.3, Bootstrap 5.0.2, FontAwesome 6.7.2, Swiper 11.2.4, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot Analytics, Hotjar, ContentSquare
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
excellent
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain locked with multiple client status prohibitions
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of CAPTCHA (Google reCAPTCHA)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Analytics (via GTM), Hotjar, ContentSquare
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
HubSpot Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, HubSpot Analytics, Hotjar, ContentSquare
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional SaaS platform for web accessibility compliance and monitoring
  2. Strong focus on WCAG and ADA compliance
  3. Good use of modern web technologies and analytics
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant
  5. No exposed security issues or vulnerabilities detected in source
  6. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  7. Domain is new but consistent with business claims
  8. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found; contact via form only
  9. No terms of service page found
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with Bootstrap framework and integrates modern libraries like FontAwesome and Swiper for UI components. Hosting is on AWS, indicated by DNS servers. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features including an accessibility toolbar and compliance with WCAG standards. SEO is supported by Yoast plugin and proper meta tags including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Analytics and marketing tools are extensively used, including HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and ContentSquare, enabling detailed user behavior tracking and marketing automation. The site uses Google Fonts and asynchronous script loading to optimize performance. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well implemented for a SaaS platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pluro.ai. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pluro.ai.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.