Skip to main content

Security report for playosmo.com

Osmo · Education · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Osmo is an educational technology company specializing in interactive learning systems that combine physical game pieces with digital apps primarily for iPad and iPhone users. The website positions Osmo as an award-winning brand with a focus on fostering social intelligence and creative thinking through hands-on play. The business model centers on e-commerce sales of educational products and digital content, targeting parents and educators seeking engaging learning tools for children. The site is professionally designed with consistent branding and positive media testimonials, indicating a strong market presence in the education sector. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, hosted behind Cloudflare, and uses Google Tag Manager for analytics. While the site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, performance metrics are unavailable. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate but lacks modern TLS protocol support and OCSP stapling, which are important for robust security. Security headers are partially implemented, but critical headers like HSTS are not fully enabled. No privacy or cookie policies were found, indicating gaps in compliance with data protection regulations. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in encryption protocols and privacy compliance. The absence of contact information and policy pages reduces transparency and user trust. The domain registration is consistent with the business claims, and no suspicious patterns were detected, supporting the legitimacy of the site. Strategic recommendations include enabling modern TLS protocols, fully implementing HSTS, publishing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, adding contact information, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure program to enhance security and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching playosmo.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
40
Email security
50
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Osmo operates in the education technology sector, offering innovative learning products that blend physical and digital play. The company leverages a direct-to-consumer e-commerce model supported by digital marketing and media endorsements. Its target audience includes parents and educators focused on early childhood education. The brand benefits from strong media recognition and consistent branding, positioning it as a reputable player in educational games. The parent company is Byju's, a major education technology firm, which may provide strategic advantages and resources. The company appears to be medium-sized with a focus on product innovation and market expansion through digital channels.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced with a valid SSL certificate; however, the lack of TLS 1.2 or 1.3 support and OCSP stapling weakens the encryption strength and certificate validation process. Security headers like X-Frame-Options and strict-transport-security are present but not fully enabled, limiting protection against clickjacking and downgrade attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is available, which could hinder timely security issue reporting and resolution. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing policy documents and consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is secure enough for general use but requires enhancements to meet higher security and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 protocols to strengthen encryption and compatibility.
  2. Fully enable HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload directives to enforce HTTPS.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance statements.
  4. Add clear contact information including support emails and phone numbers for transparency.
  5. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack with Next.js and React, indicating a contemporary and scalable architecture. Hosting via Cloudflare provides CDN and security benefits. The site is mobile-optimized and includes SEO best practices such as meta tags and Open Graph data. However, performance data is missing, and TLS protocols are not enabled, which is a technical risk. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based solution. The absence of accessibility features beyond basic viewport settings suggests room for improvement in inclusivity. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but requires updates in security protocols and performance monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with playosmo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review playosmo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.