Skip to main content

Security report for plarium.com

Plarium · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Plarium is a well-established global game developer and publisher, founded in 2010, specializing in cross-platform free-to-play games with a large user base exceeding 500 million registered players. Their portfolio includes popular titles such as RAID: Shadow Legends and Mech Arena, targeting gamers on mobile and PC platforms worldwide. The company offers additional gaming-related tools like name generators and logo makers, enhancing user engagement. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO, OneTrust for cookie consent, Google Tag Manager, and Optimizely for optimization and analytics. The site is hosted with domain registration via GoDaddy and DNS managed by Cloudflare, ensuring reliable infrastructure. The website demonstrates excellent mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, contributing to a positive user experience. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and implements key security headers. Cookie consent mechanisms comply with GDPR requirements, although no explicit security policy or incident response information is publicly available. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The domain WHOIS data is consistent and trustworthy, reflecting a mature and legitimate business. Overall, Plarium's website reflects a professional, secure, and privacy-conscious digital presence suitable for its large gaming audience. Strategic improvements could include publishing a dedicated security policy, incident response contacts, and a vulnerability disclosure program to enhance transparency and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching plarium.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
40
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Plarium holds a strong market position in the gaming industry as a large-scale developer and publisher of free-to-play cross-platform games. Their business model leverages in-app purchases and extensive user engagement through popular game titles. The company targets a broad global audience of gamers across mobile and desktop platforms. Their ecosystem includes community engagement via blogs, forums, and support services, as well as gaming tools that foster brand loyalty. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for managed support channels. The company benefits from a consistent brand identity and a professional online presence, supporting growth and competitive advantage.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, strong SSL configuration, and implementation of essential security headers such as HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and Content-Security-Policy. The presence of a cookie consent mechanism indicates GDPR compliance efforts. However, the lack of a publicly available security policy, incident response information, or vulnerability disclosure program represents a gap in transparency and readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. The security score is high but could be improved by publishing formal security documentation and providing clear channels for security incident reporting.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a comprehensive security policy outlining security practices and commitments.
  3. Establish and publicize an incident response contact channel (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email).
  4. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Plarium
Description
Plarium is a global game developer and publisher offering cross-platform games with over 500 million registered players worldwide.
Key services
Game development, Game publishing, Gaming tools (name generators, logo maker)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, OneTrust, Google Tag Manager, Optimizely, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web, Mobile
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Optimizely
Marketing tools
OneTrust, Optimizely
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Strong SEO and accessibility features implemented.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via support page.
  5. Use of multiple marketing and analytics tools with consent.
  6. No security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  8. Domain is well-established and trustworthy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with a modern and well-maintained tech stack including Yoast SEO for search optimization, OneTrust for privacy and cookie consent management, Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing, and Optimizely for A/B testing and optimization. DNS is managed via Cloudflare, providing performance and security benefits. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in load times. The technical implementation supports a professional and scalable digital presence, though enabling DNSSEC and continuous security audits would further strengthen the infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with plarium.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review plarium.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.