Skip to main content

Security report for pixman.cz

Pixman · Technology · Czech Republic

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

85/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pixman.cz is a Czech digital agency specializing in web development, e-commerce solutions, and digital marketing services. The company offers a range of services including website and e-shop development, integration with Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, online marketing strategies, creative visuals, and content management with Sitecore CMS. Their market position is that of a specialized small agency targeting businesses seeking modern digital solutions with a focus on fair play and digital innovation. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including PHP, JavaScript, and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Visual Website Optimizer. The site uses Sitecore CMS and promotes integration with Microsoft Business Central, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The website is mobile optimized and includes a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, reflecting good digital maturity and privacy awareness. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent to comply with GDPR. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not clearly detected, and no public security or incident response policies are found. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the HTML content. The WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, but the website content and business information appear legitimate and professional. Overall, Pixman.cz presents a trustworthy and professional digital presence with good privacy compliance and a solid technical foundation. Strategic improvements in security header implementation and public security policies would enhance their security posture further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pixman.cz

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
80
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
85

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pixman.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2
Employees
0
Customers
2
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for pixman.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Pixman operates as a specialized digital agency in the Czech Republic, focusing on technology and e-commerce sectors. Their competitive advantage lies in their expertise in Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central integration and Sitecore CMS content management. The business model is service-oriented, targeting B2B clients needing custom web and e-commerce solutions. Revenue streams likely include project-based development, ongoing content management, and marketing services. The target customer segment includes medium and small businesses seeking digital transformation. The company demonstrates growth potential through integration with enterprise platforms and a diversified service portfolio. Partnerships with major analytics and marketing platforms enhance their ecosystem. The website content and structure reflect a mature operation with clear service offerings and client engagement strategies.

Security posture

The security maturity of Pixman.cz is moderate to good. The site uses HTTPS and a robust cookie consent mechanism, indicating compliance with GDPR and privacy best practices. The presence of multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts introduces a moderate tracking footprint, but these are managed transparently. The absence of explicit security headers such as CSP and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which limits transparency. No vulnerabilities or sensitive data exposures were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small digital agency but could be improved with enhanced header policies and published security practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts to ensure no vulnerable or deprecated libraries are used.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pixman
Description
Vývoj webů, e-shopů, e-commerce řešení, internetových aplikací, prototypování, microsites, design, animace.
Key services
Web development, E-shop and e-commerce solutions, Internet applications, Online marketing strategies, Visuals, animation, video, and text content, Sitecore content management, Copywriter rental service
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
PHP, JavaScript, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), Cookiebot
Frameworks
Sitecore CMS
Platforms
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data detected in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO)
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Google
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO)
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with detailed cookie categorization.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML; contact form is present.
  4. No explicit privacy policy URL found in HTML snippet but indicated by meta and cookie consent references.
  5. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools with transparent privacy links.
  6. No security.txt or explicit security/incident response policies found.
  7. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or registry limitations.
  8. Website is professionally designed and targeted at Czech business clients for digital solutions.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack with PHP and JavaScript, leveraging Sitecore CMS for content management and integrating with Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central for e-commerce solutions. It uses multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Visual Website Optimizer, indicating a data-driven approach to marketing and user experience optimization. The site is mobile responsive and includes a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, reflecting good technical implementation and privacy compliance. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were detected in the provided content. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and accessibility compliance to further modernize the technical infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pixman.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pixman.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.