Skip to main content

Security report for pixelfield.co.uk

Pixelfield · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pixelfield is a London-based digital product development agency specializing in mobile and web applications, game development, UI/UX design, and emerging technologies such as blockchain, AI, AR, and VR. The company targets startups and businesses seeking innovative digital solutions, positioning itself as a reliable and experienced partner with a strong European client base. The website reflects a professional and modern digital presence with clear navigation and comprehensive service offerings. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, though it lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which impacts compliance. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and no exposed sensitive data, but could be improved by adding security headers and incident response information. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pixelfield.co.uk

This scan found 22 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
100
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Pixelfield operates in the technology sector as a service-based digital agency. Its competitive advantage lies in a broad service portfolio covering app development, game design, and advanced technologies like blockchain and AI. The company serves a European market, with partner sites in Germany and Czechia, indicating a multilingual and regional approach. Revenue streams likely derive from project-based contracts and ongoing development partnerships. The presence of client logos and testimonials enhances credibility. The business model focuses on innovation and collaboration with startups and corporates, supported by a skilled team and strategic partnerships.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and no sensitive data is exposed in the HTML. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. There is no public security policy or incident response contact, which limits transparency and readiness perception. The use of third-party scripts for analytics and marketing is standard but requires ongoing monitoring to avoid vulnerabilities. GDPR compliance is partial due to missing privacy and cookie policies and lack of explicit consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is adequate but can be enhanced to meet higher standards.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and ensure it is easily accessible from all pages.
  2. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and ePrivacy regulations.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  4. Create and publish an incident response policy or security contact page to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Pixelfield
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pixelfield
Description
Pixelfield is a software development agency based in London, UK, offering mobile apps, web apps, game development, custom software development services, UI/UX design, and more.
Key services
Mobile Apps, Web Apps, Game Development, Custom Software, UI/UX Design, Blockchain and NFTs, AI & Machine Learning, AR & VR Development, Chatbot Development, Internet of Things
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Pipedrive LeadBooster Chat, ClickCease, AOS (Animate On Scroll)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with consent defaulted to deny ad storage and personalization

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
ClickCease
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Marketing tools
Pipedrive LeadBooster Chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. No visible privacy or cookie policy pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented and consistent with structured data.
  4. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools without explicit cookie consent banner.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  6. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and business continuity.
  7. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and integrates Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Pipedrive LeadBooster for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized images. No CMS or hosting provider is explicitly detected. The site structure and meta tags support SEO well. Technical risks include the lack of security headers and missing privacy compliance mechanisms, which could affect user trust and regulatory adherence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pixelfield.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pixelfield.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.