Skip to main content

Security report for piwikpro.dk

Piwik PRO · Technology · Denmark

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Security headers.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Piwik PRO is a technology company specializing in privacy-focused analytics solutions tailored for marketing professionals and analysts. Their core offering is the Piwik PRO Analytics Suite, which emphasizes respecting user privacy and compliance with data protection regulations such as GDPR. The company positions itself as a modern, flexible analytics provider with a strong commitment to data privacy and transparency. The website content is professional and targeted primarily at marketing and analytics professionals seeking compliant analytics tools. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and marketing integrations including Yoast SEO, HubSpot forms, Google reCAPTCHA, and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism powered by CookieInformation.com. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and moderate performance. The technical stack reflects a mature digital infrastructure with a focus on privacy and user consent management. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and employs reCAPTCHA to protect forms. The cookie consent banner is detailed and allows granular user control, indicating good privacy compliance practices. However, explicit security headers and incident response policies are not evident, suggesting room for improvement in security posture documentation and transparency. Overall, the website is trustworthy, well-structured, and compliant with privacy regulations. The domain registration data aligns with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. No critical security issues or content safety concerns were identified.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching piwikpro.dk

This scan found 11 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Piwik PRO operates in the technology sector, focusing on analytics software with a niche in privacy-compliant data collection and reporting. Their business model revolves around providing analytics tools that respect user privacy, targeting marketing professionals and analysts who require GDPR-compliant solutions. The company leverages partnerships with HubSpot for marketing automation and CookieInformation.com for consent management, enhancing their ecosystem. The market positioning is that of a specialized provider emphasizing data privacy, which is a competitive advantage in the analytics space. The company appears to be relatively new (domain created in 2023) but backed by established brand presence across multiple country-specific domains. Growth indicators include multi-language support and integration with major marketing platforms.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse. The detailed cookie consent banner reflects strong privacy compliance and user control over data collection. However, the absence of explicit security headers (e.g., Content Security Policy, HSTS) and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate gaps in security transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The site would benefit from publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to enhance trust and incident response capabilities. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a marketing and analytics website but could be improved with additional security best practices and documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Piwik PRO
Description
En fleksibel analysepakke til marketingfolk og analytikere, der giver mulighed for at respektere brugernes personoplysninger hele vejen igennem
Key services
Analytics Suite, Data privacy compliant analytics, Marketing analytics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, HubSpot forms, Google reCAPTCHA, CookieInformation.com consent management, Piwik PRO analytics container
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data found

Analytics and tracking

Services
Piwik PRO
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Piwik PRO, HubSpot, Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Piwik PRO Analytics Suite
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Strong focus on privacy compliance and GDPR adherence
  3. Use of multiple third-party services for analytics and marketing
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is detailed and user-friendly
  5. No exposed security vulnerabilities detected in source content
  6. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and transparency
  7. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found, only contact form
  8. No explicit terms of service page detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO for search optimization and HubSpot for marketing forms and lead capture. It uses Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection and CookieInformation.com for cookie consent management, reflecting a modern and privacy-conscious tech stack. The site loads multiple external scripts from trusted domains and uses JSON-LD structured data for SEO and rich snippets. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness. The technical implementation is solid but could be enhanced by adding security headers and improving accessibility compliance. Hosting provider details are not explicit, but domain registration and DNS appear standard and consistent.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with piwikpro.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review piwikpro.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.