Skip to main content

Security report for pitter.eu

Nadační fond P. Pittra a O. Fierzové · Education · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'Archiv Přemysla Pittra a Olgy Fierzové' serves as an archival and educational platform preserving the legacy of two notable humanists. It is managed by a foundation and affiliated with the National Pedagogical Museum and Library in the Czech Republic. The site targets researchers, students, and the general public interested in historical and pedagogical content. The business model is non-profit, focusing on archival preservation, research facilitation, and educational outreach. Technically, the site runs on Drupal 7 with standard web technologies and includes Google Analytics for visitor tracking. While the site is functional and content-rich, it lacks modern privacy and cookie policies and uses an outdated CMS version, which may pose security risks. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing security headers and incident response information. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally presented but would benefit from enhanced compliance and security measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pitter.eu

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
55
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The archive operates within the education and non-profit sectors, leveraging its affiliation with a national museum to maintain credibility and trust. Its key services include archival management, research support, and educational programming. The target audience is niche but well-defined, focusing on academic and public interest in historical pedagogy. The site’s partnerships with related domains such as npmk.cz and pitter.eu strengthen its ecosystem. The business model is sustainable within the non-profit framework, relying on institutional support and public engagement. Growth potential lies in expanding digital access and improving compliance to meet modern standards.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, which is mandatory. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. The use of Drupal 7, an outdated CMS, introduces potential vulnerabilities if not regularly patched. No incident response or security policy information is published, limiting transparency and preparedness. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements to reduce risk and enhance trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Upgrade or migrate from Drupal 7 to a supported CMS version to reduce security risks associated with outdated software.
  4. Publish incident response and security contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Enhance mobile responsiveness and accessibility to improve user experience and compliance with accessibility standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Nadační fond P. Pittra a O. Fierzové
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nadační fond P. Pittra a O. Fierzové
Description
Archiv Přemysla Pittra a Olgy Fierzové is a historical and educational archive preserving the documentation and legacy of Přemysl Pitter and Olga Fierzová. It is managed by the Nadační fond P. Pittra a O. Fierzové, the MILIDU association, and the National Pedagogical Museum and Library J. A. Komenský. The archive serves researchers, students, and the general public interested in the life and work of these humanists.
Key services
archival preservation, research support, educational collaboration, conferences and seminars
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 7, jQuery, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is an archival and educational resource for the legacy of Přemysl Pitter and Olga Fierzová.
  2. Content is in Czech with language switch options for German and English.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Uses Drupal 7 CMS, which is outdated and may pose security risks if not maintained.
  5. Includes Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking.
  6. No visible contact phone numbers or physical addresses on the analyzed page.
  7. Contact email is embedded in text but not in a mailto link.
  8. No forms detected on the analyzed page.
  9. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  10. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 7, a widely used but now outdated CMS platform, which may pose security and maintenance challenges. The front-end uses jQuery and includes Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking. The site loads multiple CSS files and JavaScript assets asynchronously, indicating some performance optimization. However, mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, suggesting room for improvement. SEO is basic with canonical and shortlink tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph metadata detected. Hosting details are not explicit, but the domain is a subdomain of npmk.cz, indicating institutional hosting. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but dated, with modernization opportunities to improve security, performance, and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pitter.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pitter.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.