Skip to main content

Security report for pinsoft.com

PIN Computers · Technology · Serbia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PIN Computers is a Serbian company specializing in the distribution of IT equipment and consumer electronics, with additional services before and after sales. Founded in 1997 and headquartered in Novi Sad with a branch in Belgrade, it serves business customers and end users primarily in Serbia. The company offers a range of services including distribution, logistics, service, education, and sales support, positioning itself as an established regional distributor with over 25 years of experience. Technically, the website uses legacy technologies such as jQuery 1.3.2 and Google Analytics for tracking. The site lacks modern CMS frameworks and shows basic mobile optimization and SEO practices. Hosting and DNS are managed through InterNetX GmbH and managed-ip.com name servers. Performance is moderate, with room for modernization and improved accessibility. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS for analytics scripts but lacks visible security headers and uses an outdated jQuery version with known vulnerabilities. DNSSEC is not enabled, and no cookie consent mechanism is present, indicating gaps in privacy compliance. The domain registration is consistent with the company's founding date and business claims, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the website is functional and provides clear business information but requires technical and security improvements to enhance user trust and compliance. Strategic recommendations include upgrading legacy libraries, implementing security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and adding privacy and cookie policies to meet GDPR standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pinsoft.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

PIN Computers operates in the technology and retail sectors as a distributor and service provider of IT and consumer electronics in Serbia. Its competitive advantage lies in its long-standing market presence since 1997 and a comprehensive service portfolio including logistics and sales support. The business model focuses on B2B distribution with an emphasis on partner collaboration and customer support through an online portal. Revenue streams likely include product distribution margins and service fees. The company targets business customers and end users in Serbia, with growth potential in expanding digital services and logistics. Partnerships with local banks and IT service providers are indicated by linked domains. The company maintains a moderate market position with consistent branding and trust signals but lacks visible certifications or advanced digital marketing strategies.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is moderate but with notable weaknesses. The use of an outdated jQuery version exposes the site to potential client-side vulnerabilities. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No visible incident response or security policies are published, and privacy compliance is minimal with only a basic privacy policy PDF and no cookie consent mechanism. The domain is protected by clientTransferProhibited status, which is positive. Overall, the site lacks modern security best practices and would benefit from a comprehensive security review and remediation plan to reduce risk and improve compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Upgrade jQuery and all JavaScript libraries to current secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to protect domain name resolution and prevent DNS spoofing.
  3. Add standard security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Introduce a cookie consent banner and update privacy policies to explicitly address GDPR compliance.
  5. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any other vulnerabilities and establish an incident response plan.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PIN Computers
Description
Kompanija PiN Computers se bavi distribucijom informatičke opreme i potrošačke elektronike, kao i pružanjem dodatnih usluga, pre i nakon same prodaje. Sedište firme je u Novom Sadu, sa ogrankom u Beogradu.
Key services
Distribution, Service, Logistics, Education, Sales support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.3.2, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Custom JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS for analytics scripts
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (ga.js and gtag.js)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is in Serbian with some English language option.
  2. No visible forms for data collection on main page.
  3. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy found.
  4. Use of outdated jQuery version is a security concern.
  5. Google Analytics is implemented with multiple tracking IDs.
  6. Contact information is clearly presented with phone numbers and addresses.
  7. No social media links detected.
  8. No visible security or incident response policies.
  9. Privacy policy is present but only as a PDF document.
  10. No terms of service or vulnerability disclosure policies found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on legacy technology with jQuery 1.3.2 and custom JavaScript, lacking modern frameworks or CMS platforms. Google Analytics is integrated using both ga.js and gtag.js scripts, indicating partial modernization. The site uses static HTML with CSS and images hosted on the same domain. DNS is managed via managed-ip.com name servers, and the domain registrar is InterNetX GmbH. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is basic with meta tags but no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The site would benefit from modernization including responsive design, updated libraries, and improved SEO and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pinsoft.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pinsoft.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.