Skip to main content

Security report for pilvia.com

Pilvia Oy · Technology · Finland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pilvia Oy is a Finnish IT service company founded in 2015, specializing in domain management, hosting, email services, security solutions, and WordPress development platforms. The company targets businesses and educational institutions, positioning itself as a trusted IT partner with over 250 corporate clients including notable Finnish organizations. Their business model focuses on providing agile, close-to-customer IT solutions that allow clients to focus on their core activities while Pilvia manages technical aspects. The website content is professional, clear, and well-structured, reflecting a small but credible technology service provider in Finland. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks such as Astro, leverages Cloudflare for DNS and CDN services, and integrates privacy-focused analytics like Fathom. The site is fast, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly, with good accessibility features. The technical infrastructure reflects a mature digital presence suitable for a technology service company. From a security standpoint, the website enforces HTTPS, uses domain status locks to prevent unauthorized transfers or deletions, and employs Cloudflare's security features. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and some security headers are missing. The company provides comprehensive privacy and security policies, demonstrating GDPR compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious indicators were found, indicating a strong security posture for the website. Overall, Pilvia Oy presents a low-risk profile with a professional online presence, solid business credibility, and good security hygiene. Strategic improvements include enabling DNSSEC, publishing incident response contacts, and enhancing cookie consent mechanisms to further strengthen compliance and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pilvia.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
25
Email security
95
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pilvia.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
288
Employees
0
Customers
288
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
13%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for pilvia.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Pilvia Oy operates in the Finnish technology sector as an IT service provider focusing on domain registration, hosting, email solutions, security, and WordPress development platforms. Their market positioning is strengthened by a client base of over 250 companies, including well-known Finnish organizations, indicating strong trust and reputation. The business model is service-oriented, providing managed IT solutions that relieve clients from technical burdens. Revenue streams likely include domain registration fees, hosting subscriptions, managed service contracts, and development platform licensing. The company targets SMEs and educational institutions, leveraging partnerships with Cloudflare and Google Cloud to enhance service offerings. Growth indicators include a stable domain age since 2015 and a professional digital footprint. The partnership ecosystem with major cloud and security providers supports scalability and reliability. Overall, Pilvia Oy demonstrates a focused and sustainable business operation within its niche.

Security posture

Pilvia Oy exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, domain registration locks, and use of Cloudflare security services. The presence of comprehensive privacy and security policies indicates awareness of compliance requirements such as GDPR. However, the absence of DNSSEC and some recommended security headers suggests room for improvement. No incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure policies were found, which could limit rapid response capabilities. The use of privacy-respecting analytics and minimal tracking reflects good data protection practices. Overall, the security maturity is good for a small IT service provider, with no critical vulnerabilities detected. Enhancing DNS security and formalizing incident response would further improve resilience and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve DNS security.
  2. Publish an incident response contact or dedicated security page to facilitate vulnerability reporting and incident management.
  3. Implement an explicit cookie consent mechanism to comply fully with privacy regulations and enhance user trust.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen browser security.
  5. Consider creating and publishing a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible security reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Pilvia Oy
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pilvia Oy
Description
Ketterä ja lähellä oleva IT-kumppani, joka hoitaa tekniset asiat puolestasi.
Key services
Verkkotunnukset (Domain management), Palvelimien ylläpito (Server maintenance), Sähköpostit (Email services via Google Workspace), Tietoturva (Security solutions), WordPress-kehitysalusta (WordPress development platform), Oppilaitoksille (Education sector WordPress platform)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Astro v5.15.1, Cloudflare DNS and CDN, Google Workspace, Sanity.io (image hosting), Fathom Analytics, Cloudflare Insights
Frameworks
Astro
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Cloudflare for CDN and security

Analytics and tracking

Services
Fathom Analytics, Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Fathom Analytics, Cloudflare Insights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Finnish and professionally presented.
  3. Clear legal and privacy documentation is provided.
  4. Contact information is complete and consistent.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics with privacy focus.
  6. No suspicious or malicious indicators found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Astro framework version 5.15.1, indicating a modern static site generation approach. It uses Cloudflare for DNS and CDN services, enhancing performance and security. Images and media are hosted on Sanity.io, a headless CMS platform, which supports scalable content management. Analytics are handled by privacy-focused Fathom Analytics and Cloudflare Insights, minimizing invasive tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and structured navigation. No CMS is explicitly detected for the website itself, though WordPress is offered as a service. Performance is fast with modern technologies and minimal external dependencies. Technical risks are low, but enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers would reduce attack surface further.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pilvia.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pilvia.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.