Skip to main content

Security report for pictureideas.lt

Picture Ideas · Technology · Lithuania

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Picture Ideas is a Lithuanian digital services company specializing in creating internet websites, e-commerce solutions, and web-based systems. Established in 2013, the company targets businesses seeking effective digital solutions to enhance their market presence and operational efficiency. Their portfolio includes collaborations with strong industrial and governmental clients, indicating a solid market position in the technology sector. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and analytics tools, hosted behind Cloudflare, ensuring good performance and security. However, the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies, as well as contact details, indicates gaps in privacy compliance and user trust facilitation. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and Cloudflare protection, but could be improved with additional security headers and published policies. Overall, the website is professional and functional but should address compliance and transparency to enhance trust and legal adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pictureideas.lt

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates as a small-sized technology service provider focused on digital transformation for businesses. Their business model revolves around custom web development, e-commerce platform creation, and integrated web systems, supported by visual identity services like photography and videography. The target audience includes medium to large enterprises and governmental organizations in Lithuania. The company leverages SEO and analytics tools to optimize client projects and maintain a competitive edge. Their market positioning is strengthened by a decade-long presence and a portfolio featuring reputable clients. Strategic partnerships, such as the related domain pictureideas.agency, suggest a broader ecosystem supporting multilingual or international outreach. Revenue streams likely derive from project-based contracts and ongoing digital service maintenance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, Cloudflare DNS and CDN usage, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The integration of analytics and session recording tools like Google Analytics and Smartlook is done via asynchronous scripts, minimizing performance impact. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which could hinder timely security issue management. Forms are present but lack visible advanced security controls or anti-CSRF tokens in the HTML. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which is a significant compliance gap under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is good but can be enhanced by formalizing policies and adding security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with a consent mechanism to comply with GDPR.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Develop and publish an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance security readiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Picture Ideas
Description
Kuriame įvaizdines svetaines, el. komercijos sprendimus, projektuojame ir kuriame web pagrindu veikiančias sistemas.
Key services
Internet websites, E-commerce solutions, Web systems design and development, Visual identity, photography, videography
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare DNS and likely CDN, Contact Form 7, Slick Slider, Lightbox2, Lenis (scrolling library), Smartlook (session recording)
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Cloudflare for DNS and protection
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Smartlook
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Smartlook
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content rich
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in HTML content
  4. Uses modern web technologies and analytics tools
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information
  6. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and business age
  7. No WAF or blocking detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1, utilizing popular plugins such as Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and Contact Form 7 for form management. It employs modern JavaScript libraries including Slick Slider for UI components and Lenis for smooth scrolling. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. Analytics are implemented through Google Analytics and Smartlook for user behavior tracking. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with some lazy loading and caching mechanisms in place. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA attributes and better semantic markup. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, though opportunities exist to enhance security and privacy compliance through additional headers and policies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pictureideas.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pictureideas.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.