Skip to main content

Security report for picanova.org

The Customization Group · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Customization Group is a large technology company specializing in mass customization solutions, serving millions of customers globally through tailored B2B and API services. The company positions itself as a world market leader in this niche, focusing on sustainable and scalable customization offerings. The website is professionally designed using the Wix platform, with a clear business description and structured data supporting SEO and business identity. However, the absence of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy and transparency. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies and security hardening scripts, ensuring a good security posture with HTTPS and client-side protections. Privacy and cookie policies are not found, and contact information is limited to a postal address, which impacts privacy compliance and business credibility scores. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  4. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching picanova.org

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention picanova.org, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for picanova.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets B2B customers and API integrators seeking mass customization solutions, leveraging a business model focused on scalable, API-driven services. Its market position as a world leader suggests strong competitive advantages in technology and service delivery. The website content and structured data indicate a focus on sustainability and tailored solutions, appealing to enterprise clients. The lack of visible contact emails or phone numbers and missing WHOIS data may hinder trust for some stakeholders. No partnerships or subsidiaries are explicitly identified from the website content. The company appears to maintain a consistent brand and professional online presence, supporting its market positioning.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, security scripts to harden fetch and XMLHttpRequest calls, and cookie management that restricts access tokens. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies limit the overall security transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident. The security culture appears to be partially implemented but could be improved with clearer policies and contact channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Provide clear company contact emails and phone numbers for support and sales to enhance business credibility.
  4. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to improve security posture.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization for better user experience and search engine ranking.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
The Customization Group
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
The Customization Group
Description
A world market leader in mass customization, serving millions of customers with our tailored B2B and API solutions. Sustainably.
Key services
Mass customization solutions, B2B tailored services, API integration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Wix.com Website Builder, JavaScript, Webpack, Core-js polyfills
Frameworks
Wix Thunderbolt
Platforms
Wix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security scripts to harden fetch and XHR
  • Cookie handling with access token protection

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with professional design
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible domain registration issues or recent registration
  3. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in HTML content
  4. Contact information limited to postal address in structured data; no emails or phone numbers explicitly found
  5. Security scripts present to harden client-side requests and cookie handling
  6. No evidence of WAF or blocking mechanisms
  7. SEO and accessibility features are basic but present
  8. No visible analytics or tracking scripts detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform using Wix Thunderbolt framework and modern JavaScript tooling including Webpack and polyfills for browser compatibility. Hosting is managed by Wix, ensuring reliable infrastructure and HTTPS support. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Mobile optimization is good, supporting responsive design. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured data but could be improved with more comprehensive content and policies. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, with security hardening scripts implemented client-side. There is no evidence of legacy or vulnerable libraries. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but can be enhanced with additional security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with picanova.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review picanova.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.