Skip to main content

Security report for phzh.ch

PH Zürich · Education · Switzerland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PH Zürich is a well-established educational institution in Switzerland focused on teacher education, continuing education, research, and educational services. The website reflects a professional and comprehensive digital presence targeting students, educators, and researchers. The institution maintains a strong market position within the Swiss education sector, supported by accreditations and a broad range of educational offerings. Technically, the website employs modern technologies including Blazor, Matomo analytics, and Monsido for accessibility and heatmaps, hosted on a secure HTTPS platform with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, though improvements can be made in cookie consent and security policy transparency. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professional, and compliant with GDPR, though it lacks explicit cookie consent mechanisms and published security policies. Strategic recommendations include implementing cookie consent, enhancing security headers, and publishing incident response information to further strengthen compliance and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching phzh.ch

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

PH Zürich operates as a public higher education institution specializing in teacher training and educational research. Its business model revolves around providing degree programs, professional development, and research services primarily to the Swiss education sector. The institution benefits from accreditations by Swiss Universities and the Swiss Accreditation Council, enhancing its credibility. The website's content and navigation are tailored to prospective and current students, educators, and academic partners. The presence of multiple social media channels and external partnerships indicates an active engagement strategy. The institution's growth is supported by digital initiatives such as the Immerse Lab and collaborations with ETH Zürich, positioning it competitively in the education market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS and no exposed sensitive data in the HTML content. Use of Matomo analytics and Monsido tools suggests attention to privacy and accessibility. However, the absence of visible security headers and lack of published security or incident response policies indicate areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or suspicious domains were detected. The site does not currently implement a cookie consent mechanism, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a GDPR-compliant cookie consent banner to inform users and obtain consent for tracking.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve protection against common web attacks.
  4. Consider creating and publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PH Zürich
Description
Die PH Zürich gestaltet Bildung aktiv mit und bietet einen pulsierenden Ort des Lehrens und Lernens – wissenschaftlich, praxisorientiert, vernetzt.
Key services
Teacher education programs, Continuing education and professional development, Research and development in education, Educational services and consulting
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Matomo Analytics, Monsido (for accessibility and heatmaps), Blazor Server, Custom Web Components, FullCalendar
Frameworks
Blazor
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern analytics with privacy considerations

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo, Monsido Heatmaps
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics, Monsido Accessibility and Heatmaps
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Content is comprehensive and relevant to education and teacher training
  3. Strong presence of social media and external accreditation links
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity
  5. No visible forms collecting personal data on the homepage
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  7. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Blazor Server for interactive components, Matomo for privacy-focused analytics, and Monsido for accessibility and heatmap tracking. The CMS appears to be EPiServer, indicated by references to EPiServerForms and find.js. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with responsive design and skip links for navigation. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple analytics and tracking scripts. The site uses canonical and hreflang tags for SEO optimization. Hosting details are not explicit but analytics are served via Matomo Cloud. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience with room for performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with phzh.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review phzh.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.