Skip to main content

Security report for phdl.at

Private Pädagogische Hochschule der Diözese Linz · Education · Austria

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.phdl.at represents the Private Pädagogische Hochschule der Diözese Linz, a private pedagogical university in Austria offering teacher education, professional development, research, and international programs. The institution targets educators, students, and school leaders with a comprehensive range of academic and training services. The website is built on TYPO3 CMS and integrates modern analytics and consent management tools, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. The design and content quality are good, with clear navigation and relevant educational information. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security and privacy policies are missing. WHOIS data confirms the legitimacy and consistency of the domain registration with the institution's identity. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching phdl.at

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
28
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

PHDL holds a strong regional position as a private educational institution specializing in teacher training and pedagogical research. Its business model focuses on education services including degree programs, continuing education, and research projects. The website indicates active partnerships and international cooperation, enhancing its market reach. The institution leverages digital tools for outreach and analytics but lacks some compliance documentation publicly. The presence of multiple social media channels and detailed program information supports engagement with its target audience. Growth potential lies in expanding digital offerings and formalizing security and privacy frameworks.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent management, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. Analytics tools used include Matomo and Siteimprove, which are privacy-conscious when configured properly. However, the absence of a published privacy policy, terms of service, security policy, and incident response contacts represents compliance and transparency gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Security headers were not explicitly identified, suggesting room for improvement. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by publishing formal policies and improving header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data processing and user rights.
  2. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal disclaimers.
  3. Develop and publish a security policy including incident response procedures and contacts.
  4. Implement and document security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Private Pädagogische Hochschule der Diözese Linz
Description
Die Private Pädagogische Hochschule der Diözese Linz bietet als Bildungszentrum Aus-, Fort- und Weiterbildung für Lehrer/-innen und für Angehörige anderer pädagogischer Berufe.
Key services
Lehramtsausbildung (Primarstufe, Sekundarstufe, Religion), Fortbildung und Weiterbildung (Seminare, Hochschullehrgänge, Doktorat), Forschung und Wissenschaftstransfer, Beratung und Schulentwicklung, Internationale Vernetzung und Austauschprogramme
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, JavaScript, CSS, Matomo Analytics, Usercentrics Consent Management, Siteimprove Analytics
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Siteimprove Analytics, Piwik Pro
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo, Siteimprove Analytics, Piwik Pro
Marketing tools
Usercentrics Consent Management
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is comprehensive and well-structured for an educational institution.
  3. Use of multiple analytics and consent management tools indicates attention to privacy compliance.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. Social media presence is active with official accounts linked.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses TYPO3 CMS, a robust and widely used content management system, ensuring scalability and maintainability. The tech stack includes modern JavaScript libraries and CSS for responsive design, with integration of analytics and consent management scripts. Performance is moderate with some room for optimization. The site is mobile-friendly and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting details are not explicit but the domain uses HTTPS with a valid certificate. Technical risks are low, but the absence of some security headers and formal policies could pose compliance risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with phdl.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review phdl.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.