Skip to main content

Security report for petrkvapil.cz

Petr Kvapil · Technology · Czech Republic

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Petr Kvapil operates a professional web development service specializing in creating modern websites, e-shops, SEO optimization, and custom web projects primarily targeting businesses and individuals in the Czech Republic. The website showcases a portfolio of client references and testimonials, indicating a well-established presence with over 20 years of experience and more than 100 websites developed. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on tailored digital solutions with a strong emphasis on client satisfaction and technical quality. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, AOS, Flickity, and other JavaScript libraries to deliver a responsive and visually appealing user experience. The use of a proprietary CMS allows for rapid updates and customization. While performance is moderate and mobile optimization is good, accessibility features are basic. SEO practices are implemented effectively, supported by proper meta tags and structured content. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies, which are important for compliance and user trust. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy and registration transparency. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for tracking without visible consent mechanisms, indicating potential privacy compliance gaps. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy in content and design but would benefit from enhanced security practices, privacy compliance improvements, and verification of domain registration details to strengthen its risk posture and user confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching petrkvapil.cz

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a small but experienced player in the Czech web development market, leveraging long-term client relationships and a portfolio of diverse projects including cultural festivals, e-commerce, and corporate websites. Its competitive advantage lies in custom solutions and a proprietary CMS enabling flexible client requirements. Revenue streams likely derive from project-based contracts and ongoing web hosting or maintenance services. The target customers are SMEs and organizations seeking tailored digital presence. The business ecosystem includes partnerships with event organizers and specialized clients, indicating a niche focus. Growth indicators include a steady portfolio and client testimonials but lack explicit financial or market share data.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate but incomplete. Key vulnerabilities include missing security headers, lack of visible privacy and cookie policies, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. The use of HTTPS is assumed but not confirmed from provided data. Data protection practices are minimal, with no GDPR compliance indicators or data retention policies evident. Incident response readiness is not demonstrated, and no security culture indicators are present on the site. These gaps expose the business to potential compliance risks and user trust issues, especially given the use of tracking technologies without consent mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance site security.
  3. Verify and publish domain WHOIS information to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  4. Establish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain a strong security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Petr Kvapil
Description
Tvořím úspěšné weby, které zaměřuji na plnění jejich cílů jako prodej služeb, produktů, prezentace firmy a podobně.
Key services
Tvorba webových stránek, Tvorba internetových e-shopů, Optimalizace stránek pro vyhledávače, Webové projekty na míru, Webhosting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, AOS, Flickity, Highlight.js, Jarallax, Typed.js, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Analytics with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found.
  4. Contact information is limited to email and physical address; no phone number found.
  5. No security.txt or incident response information present.
  6. Uses modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks for UI and UX.
  7. Includes client testimonials and portfolio references enhancing credibility.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. Google Analytics and Tag Manager used for tracking with no visible consent mechanism.
Technical notes

Notes

The website infrastructure is built on a solid foundation of popular front-end libraries and frameworks, ensuring a responsive and modern user interface. The proprietary CMS supports rapid content updates and customization, which is a technical strength. However, the absence of detailed hosting provider information and security headers suggests potential technical debt or oversight in security hardening. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading times and accessibility compliance. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly but could benefit from enhanced technical documentation and security best practices to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with petrkvapil.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review petrkvapil.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.