Skip to main content

Security report for perf.report

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

perf.report is a niche technology platform focused on ranking and analyzing website performance globally, emphasizing Core Web Vitals metrics. The site targets web developers, SEO professionals, and digital marketers seeking insights into website speed and user experience. It positions itself as a leaderboard for the fastest websites, providing valuable benchmarking data. The platform is powered in partnership with speedvitals.com, indicating a collaborative ecosystem for performance analytics. Technically, the site is built using modern web technologies including SvelteKit and integrates Microsoft Clarity for user behavior analytics. The website demonstrates fast loading times, good mobile optimization, and a professional design, contributing to a positive user experience. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as lack of explicit contact information, limits its compliance posture and business transparency. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers, which could be improved to enhance protection against common web threats. Overall, the domain appears legitimate but lacks WHOIS transparency due to unsupported TLD WHOIS data. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices would strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching perf.report

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention perf.report, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for perf.report right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

perf.report operates in the technology sector, providing a specialized service in website performance benchmarking. Its business model revolves around offering free performance reports and rankings, likely monetized through partnerships or premium analytics services. The partnership with speedvitals.com suggests a collaborative approach to delivering performance insights. The target audience includes website owners, developers, and digital marketers who prioritize site speed and Core Web Vitals for SEO and user experience. The platform's market position is that of a niche leader in web performance leaderboards, with a small but focused user base. The lack of detailed company information and contact data suggests a lean operation or early-stage business. Growth potential exists through expanding service offerings, improving compliance, and enhancing user engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with mandatory HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options indicates room for improvement in mitigating common web vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The site uses secure form inputs for URL submissions but lacks visible incident response or security policy documentation. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which could expose the site to regulatory risks under GDPR or similar frameworks. The integration of Microsoft Clarity for analytics introduces moderate user tracking, but no explicit data retention or privacy compliance details are provided. Overall, the security maturity is basic with recommendations to implement security headers, privacy policies, and incident response mechanisms to enhance resilience and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR and global privacy compliance.
  2. Add standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish clear contact information and establish an incident response contact channel to improve transparency and security readiness.
  4. Consider creating and publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible security reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide detailed SEO metadata to improve user experience and search engine visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Discover the fastest websites on the planet with perf.report. Get the Core Web Vitals ranking and other metrics of websites
Key services
Website performance ranking, Core Web Vitals metrics, Performance reports
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
SvelteKit, JavaScript, CSS, Google Fonts, Microsoft Clarity
Frameworks
SvelteKit
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure form inputs

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers are provided.
  4. Site uses modern SvelteKit framework and loads quickly with good mobile optimization.
  5. Security headers are not detected in the HTML content; HTTPS is used.
  6. Microsoft Clarity is used for user behavior analytics.
  7. The site is focused on ranking website performance and providing Core Web Vitals data.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
  9. WHOIS data is unavailable due to TLD not supported by WHOIS query; no registrar or registrant info extracted.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern SvelteKit framework, leveraging JavaScript and CSS with Google Fonts integration for typography. It uses Microsoft Clarity for user behavior analytics and loads additional scripts from speedvitals.com, indicating a partnership. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and fast loading times, supported by efficient asset loading and minimal blocking resources. No CMS or hosting provider details are explicitly detected. The absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates technical debt in compliance and security best practices. The form for URL submission is simple and secure but lacks visible anti-bot or CAPTCHA protections. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and performant but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 59/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with perf.report. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review perf.report.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.