Skip to main content

Security report for perawallet.app

Pera Wallet LDA · Technology · Portugal

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pera Wallet LDA operates a leading Algorand blockchain wallet platform offering secure, open source, and community-driven services. Their product suite includes mobile and web wallets, token swapping, NFT management, dApp connectivity, and Ledger hardware wallet integration. The company targets Algorand users and crypto enthusiasts, positioning itself as a trusted and user-friendly gateway to the Algorand ecosystem. Technically, the website is well-built using modern frameworks like Bootstrap and jQuery, hosted on AWS S3, and optimized for mobile and SEO. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and incident response details are not published. Overall, the domain registration and WHOIS data align well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching perawallet.app

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Pera Wallet holds a strong market position within the Algorand ecosystem as a comprehensive wallet provider. Its open source and community-driven approach fosters trust and engagement. Revenue streams likely include wallet services, partnerships (e.g., Ledger), and possibly affiliate programs. The company maintains active social media channels and community support, enhancing brand visibility. Strategic partnerships with Algorand Foundation and portfolio data providers strengthen its ecosystem integration. The business model focuses on self-custodial wallet security and ease of use, appealing to both novice and experienced crypto users.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS, cookie consent, and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency. No security headers were detected in the HTML response, which could be improved. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Crisp Chat is managed with consent. Overall, the security risk is low but could be enhanced by formalizing security governance and disclosure practices.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information on the website.
  2. Implement and expose a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  3. Add HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing direct company contact emails and phone numbers for support and security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pera Wallet LDA
Description
Pera Wallet is the easiest and safest way to store, buy and swap on the Algorand blockchain. It is secure, open source, and community driven.
Key services
Mobile wallet for Algorand, Web wallet, Token swap, NFT management, dApp connectivity, Ledger hardware wallet support, Portfolio tracking
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Analytics, Crisp Chat, ClipboardJS
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Web, Mobile (iOS, Android)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of self-custodial wallet model

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads (AW-10869958867)
Marketing tools
Mailchimp (newsletter subscription)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Strong focus on Algorand blockchain wallet services with multiple product offerings.
  3. Good privacy and cookie policy implementation with consent mechanisms.
  4. Active community engagement via social media and support channels.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and hosting on AWS S3 for static assets.
  6. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  8. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via forms and social media.
  9. High user ratings and trust indicators present.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and performant tech stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for interactivity, and AWS S3 for static asset hosting. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for analytics with cookie consent management. The site is mobile-optimized with fast loading times and good SEO practices. No CMS was detected, indicating a custom or static site approach. Technical risks are minimal but could be reduced by adding security headers and formalizing security disclosures.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with perawallet.app. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review perawallet.app.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.