Skip to main content

Security report for pentera.io

Pentera · Technology · Israel

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pentera is a technology company specializing in automated security validation and exposure management solutions. Their platform offers automated penetration testing and attack surface validation for cloud, hybrid, and on-premises environments, targeting security professionals and enterprises globally. The company is recognized as a leader in its field, with strong customer endorsements and industry certifications. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern performance optimizations and integrates marketing and analytics tools such as HubSpot and Google Tag Manager. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly, reflecting a mature digital presence. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and employs domain transfer protections, though it lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no visible cookie consent mechanism. Overall, Pentera demonstrates a strong security posture and business credibility with minor areas for improvement in transparency and technical security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pentera.io

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
75
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pentera.io, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
24
Employees
3
Customers
7
Third parties
14
Weak passwords
0%

Latest record dated 2025-09-25 · 4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for pentera.io.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –staging.app.pentera.io2025-09-25
  • –staging.app.pentera.io2025-07-23
  • –app.pentera.io2025-04-14

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate pentera.io and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
16
Registered
16
Resolving
16
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-06-19

Masked preview

  • pe•••••.ioMediumbitsquatting
  • pa•••••.ioMediumbitsquatting
  • le•••••.ioMediumreplacement

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of pentera.io with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Pentera operates in the cybersecurity technology sector, focusing on continuous security validation and risk reduction. Their business model is B2B SaaS, serving a broad range of customers from SMBs to large enterprises. The company leverages partnerships and maintains a strong ecosystem with dedicated portals for partners and customers. Their market positioning is reinforced by high ratings on platforms like G2 and visible industry certifications. Revenue streams likely include platform subscriptions, professional services, and advisory offerings. The company emphasizes research and innovation through its Pentera Labs, enhancing competitive advantage. Growth indicators include active event hosting and a comprehensive resource library. Strategic observations highlight a focus on automation and cloud security, aligning with current cybersecurity trends.

Security posture

Pentera's website and domain exhibit a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections in place. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS represents opportunities for enhancement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site uses secure forms powered by HubSpot, but lacks explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could improve transparency and trust. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy but no cookie consent mechanism, potentially exposing the company to GDPR compliance risks. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from additional technical and policy measures to align with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a visible cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Publish detailed security policies including incident response and vulnerability disclosure procedures.
  5. Consider publishing a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pentera
Description
Automated penetration testing and attack surface validation for cloud, hybrid, and on-prem. Built to support CTEM and reduce true cyber exposure.
Key services
Automated Security Validation, Pentera Platform, Pentera Core, Pentera Cloud, Pentera Surface, Credential Exposure, RansomwareReady™, Security Validation Advisory
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, jQuery, HubSpot Forms, Google Tag Manager, Vimeo Player API, YouTube API, WP Rocket (performance optimization)
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
AWS (inferred from DNS and logos)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security-related certifications

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot, Qualified
Marketing tools
HubSpot Forms, Qualified
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking mechanisms.
  2. Strong branding and consistent messaging around automated security validation.
  3. Multiple customer testimonials and industry recognition enhance trust.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and performance optimizations.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed; contact primarily via forms.
  6. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected despite GDPR relevance.
  7. Security policies and incident response information are limited or not explicitly presented.
  8. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and consistency with business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, enhanced with Yoast SEO for search optimization and WP Rocket for performance improvements. It integrates multiple third-party services including HubSpot for marketing automation, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and Qualified for user engagement. The hosting infrastructure is likely AWS-based, inferred from DNS and branding. The site demonstrates fast loading times, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility considerations. Technical debt appears low with modern lazy loading and script management. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and DNS configurations. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence aligned with business goals.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pentera.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pentera.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.