Skip to main content

Security report for pentainvestments.com

Penta Investments · Other · Czech Republic

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Penta Investments is a well-established investment group with over 30 years of experience, focusing on long-term value investments across diverse sectors including retail, healthcare, real estate, financial services, manufacturing, and media. The company employs over 50,000 people and maintains a strong regional presence with offices in multiple European countries. Their website reflects a professional and comprehensive digital presence, emphasizing responsible business practices and social responsibility. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern frameworks and includes robust SEO and GDPR compliance features. Security posture is generally strong with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though there is room for improvement in security headers and explicit incident response policies. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable concern for domain transparency but does not necessarily indicate malicious intent given the professional nature of the site. Overall, Penta Investments presents a credible and trustworthy business profile with a mature digital infrastructure.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of pentainvestments.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pentainvestments.com

This scan found 15 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
100
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pentainvestments.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
2
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for pentainvestments.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a significant market position as a diversified investment group with a portfolio spanning multiple industries. Their business model centers on long-term investments and organic growth, supported by substantial capital expenditures. The website and linked domains suggest a well-integrated partnership ecosystem, including the Penta Fund and professional service providers. The target audience includes investors, business partners, and stakeholders interested in corporate investment opportunities. Growth indicators include recent news of record profits and leadership updates. The company maintains a strong compliance posture with GDPR and cookie regulations, enhancing trust and credibility.

Security posture

Penta Investments demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS, cookie consent management, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options indicates potential areas for enhancement. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, which could improve transparency and readiness. The use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools is managed with user consent, aligning with privacy regulations. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from formalized policies and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and partners to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and reduce attack surface.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider publishing a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
PENTA INVESTMENTS LIMITED
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Penta Investments
Description
Penta Investments is a long-term investment group with over 30 years of experience, employing more than 50,000 people. They focus on building successful companies across multiple sectors including retail, healthcare, real estate, financial services, manufacturing, and media. The group emphasizes responsible business practices and social responsibility.
Key services
Investment management, Portfolio company development, Social responsibility initiatives
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Slick Slider, UIkit, WordPress, Yoast SEO, Complianz GDPR plugin, Fancybox
Frameworks
Bootstrap, UIkit
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Adform
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong compliance with GDPR and cookie consent regulations.
  3. No visible security headers detected in HTML source; potential area for improvement.
  4. WHOIS data missing, which is a concern for domain transparency.
  5. Multiple social media and external links to reputable platforms.
  6. No contact forms detected on main page; contact info provided via phone and addresses.
  7. No terms of service page found.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  9. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools with consent mechanism.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap, UIkit, jQuery, and Slick Slider for UI components. SEO is managed via Yoast SEO plugin, and GDPR compliance is handled by Complianz. The site loads multiple external scripts for analytics and marketing, including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Adform. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and responsive design. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The site lacks some security headers which are recommended for modern web applications. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 79/100Low24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pentainvestments.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pentainvestments.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.