The website ts.net presents a minimal informational page with the title 'What is ts.net?'. It leverages modern web technologies including React and Next.js frameworks, and integrates multiple analytics and advertising tools such as Google Analytics 4, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Reddit Pixel, and Bing Ads. Despite the technical sophistication, the site lacks visible business information, contact details, privacy policies, or terms of service, which limits its transparency and trustworthiness. The domain registration is privacy protected, which is common but reduces public visibility into ownership details. Security posture is weak due to absence of security headers and explicit security policies. Overall, the site appears to be a technology-related informational resource but lacks comprehensive compliance and business credibility indicators.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Observed on the first page load as a new visitor, before any consent choice; Guard does not click the banner. A consent mechanism is present (IAB GPP, Ketch), but these analytics or marketing cookies were already set: Reddit (_rdt_uuid); Microsoft (_clck, _clsk); Google (_gcl_au); LinkedIn (bcookie, lidc).
What to do: Configure the consent platform to block these tags until the visitor accepts the matching category.
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 9 issues across 3 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention ts.net, from OffSeq Breach.
1,135 subdomains affected
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for ts.net.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with ts.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ts.net.