Skip to main content

Security report for boyp.com

Redirects to chromewebdata; the website checks ran on that page, the DNS and email checks on boyp.com.

Other

Partial score · DNS & email only

49/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The analyzed website is currently inaccessible and presents an HTTP ERROR 436 page, which is a non-standard HTTP error indicating a problem with the site or server. The page content is minimal and includes only a generic error message and a reload button pointing to the same domain. The presence of the Chrome offline dinosaur game script indicates this is a default browser error page rather than an active business website. Due to the lack of accessible content, no business information, privacy policies, or contact details are available for analysis. The technical infrastructure appears to be minimal, with no advanced security headers or analytics detected. The security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS enforcement and security best practices. Overall, the site is either down, blocked, or misconfigured, preventing meaningful analysis or engagement.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
GDPR outside view
60/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
8of 9

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      There is no DMARC record at _dmarc.boyp.com, so receivers have no instruction for mail that fails SPF and DKIM.

      What to do: Publish a TXT record at _dmarc.boyp.com, starting with "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@boyp.com" and moving to p=quarantine or p=reject once reports look clean.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching boyp.com

This scan found 9 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
77
DNS health
95
Network security
100
Website hygiene
100
GDPR outside view
60
Average
72
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
  • Accessibility: Accessibility is a separate readout from security, so it is reported but not scored. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS · found on this site
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention boyp.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for boyp.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

No business intelligence can be derived from the current website content as it is an error page with no company information, services, or market positioning. The domain WHOIS data is privacy protected or unavailable, which further limits insights into the business entity behind the domain. There are no indications of partnerships, subsidiaries, or business operations. The lack of contact information and policies suggests the domain is not actively maintained or is under privacy protection without clear justification.

Security posture

The website lacks visible security headers and does not demonstrate adherence to common security best practices. The SSL configuration is basic or unknown due to the error page status. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. The domain WHOIS privacy protection without transparency reduces trust. The site is currently inaccessible, which may be due to server misconfiguration or blocking by a web application firewall. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators are detected in the provided content, but the lack of security controls is a concern.

Recommendations

  1. Restore website accessibility and ensure proper server configuration to avoid HTTP errors.
  2. Implement and publish privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Add clear contact information and business details to improve credibility and user trust.
  4. Enhance security posture by enabling HTTPS, adding security headers, and publishing incident response contacts.
  5. Review WHOIS data to reduce privacy protection if not justified, improving transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. The content is an error page (HTTP ERROR 436) with minimal content and no actual website data, indicating the site is inaccessible or blocked. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, LitElement, Canvas API, AudioContext API
Frameworks
LitElement
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is an error page indicating HTTP ERROR 436.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or business details available.
  4. No external links except a reload button pointing to the same domain.
  5. The page includes a Chrome offline dinosaur game script, indicating a default error page.
  6. No analytics, advertising, or tracking scripts detected.
  7. No social media or email contacts found.
  8. No forms or data collection mechanisms present.
  9. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  10. WHOIS data is privacy protected or not provided.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern JavaScript technologies including LitElement and Canvas API for rendering the Chrome offline dinosaur game, which is embedded in the error page. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is available. The page is mobile optimized and includes accessibility features such as ARIA labels for the game. SEO optimization is poor due to the lack of meaningful content and meta tags. Performance is moderate given the minimal content. The site currently serves an error page, indicating technical issues that prevent normal operation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with boyp.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review boyp.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.