Skip to main content

Security report for phantombladezerosaves.com

Phantom Blade Zero Saves · Other

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in GDPR outside view.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Phantom Blade Zero Saves is a niche website dedicated to providing PC gamers of Phantom Blade Zero with starter save files and a browser-based save editor. The site offers verified decrypted save files compatible with the Steam PC edition of the game, along with detailed guides on save file locations and troubleshooting. It targets a specialized gaming audience seeking to enhance or modify their game experience. Technically, the website is well-implemented with modern web standards, including local cryptographic operations for save editing, Google Fonts for typography, and Google AdSense for monetization. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with clear navigation and relevant content. However, it lacks formal privacy and cookie policies, contact information, and explicit security policies, which are areas for improvement. Security posture is moderate with no visible vulnerabilities but missing security headers and incident response contacts. Overall, the website is functional, trustworthy within its niche, but could enhance compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
GDPR outside view
62/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
9of 9

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      The page loads Google Marketing, Google Syndication, but no privacy or cookie policy link was found to name these recipients.

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching phantombladezerosaves.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
89
Security headers
53
Email security
89
DNS health
95
Network security
100
Website hygiene
85
GDPR outside view
62
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
  • Accessibility: Accessibility is a separate readout from security, so it is reported but not scored. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as a small-scale community resource focused on Phantom Blade Zero PC players, providing downloadable save files and editing tools. Its business model includes affiliate marketing through Instant Gaming for game key sales and advertising via Google AdSense. The market position is niche with limited direct competition, serving a dedicated segment of gamers. The site demonstrates consistent branding and good content quality, supporting user needs with technical guides and verified resources. There is no evidence of a larger corporate structure or subsidiaries. The partnership with Instant Gaming suggests a revenue stream from affiliate commissions. Growth potential depends on the game's popularity and community engagement.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. The site uses HTTPS and local browser cryptography to protect user data during save editing, avoiding server-side file uploads. However, it lacks published privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and incident response contacts, which are important for compliance and trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The absence of forms reduces attack surface but also limits user engagement options. The site should implement security best practices such as Content-Security-Policy headers and provide clear privacy and security documentation to improve posture and compliance with regulations like GDPR.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add clear contact information and a security incident response channel (e.g., security@ email).
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance advertising transparency by disclosing affiliate relationships and cookie usage.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Phantom Blade Zero Saves
Description
Provides decrypted and verified Phantom Blade Zero PC starter save files and a local browser save editor for the game.
Key services
Starter save files for Phantom Blade Zero, Browser-based save editor, Guides on save file location and troubleshooting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts, Google AdSense, WebCrypto API, Oodle Kraken WASM
Platforms
PC Steam
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • No upload of user save files to server (local browser decryption and editing)
  • Use of HTTPS implied by canonical URL (https://phantombladezerosaves.com/)
  • No visible forms collecting sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website provides niche utility for Phantom Blade Zero PC players.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating potential compliance gaps.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  4. No forms collecting user data detected.
  5. Uses Google AdSense for monetization and an affiliate link for game key sales.
  6. Good technical implementation with modern fonts and local browser cryptography for save editing.
  7. No visible security headers or explicit security policies.
  8. No social media or company contact information present.
  9. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with modern HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript technologies, leveraging Google Fonts and WebCrypto APIs for client-side cryptographic operations. It uses Oodle Kraken WASM for save file decompression and Google AdSense for monetization. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). No CMS or hosting provider details were detected. Performance is fast with preloading and async script loading. There is no evidence of technical debt or outdated libraries. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and formalize privacy and compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with phantombladezerosaves.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review phantombladezerosaves.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.