Skip to main content

Security report for pentainvestments.com

Penta Investments · Finance · N/a

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Penta Investments is a well-established investment group with over 30 years of experience, focusing on long-term value investments across multiple sectors including retail, healthcare, real estate, financial services, manufacturing, and media. The company employs over 50,000 people and emphasizes responsible business practices and social responsibility. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image targeting investors and business partners. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using modern frameworks like Bootstrap and jQuery, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers and incident response information are missing. The absence of WHOIS data is a concern but the overall digital presence and business information support legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and verifying domain registration details.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 20 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pentainvestments.com

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
100
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pentainvestments.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
2
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for pentainvestments.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Penta Investments holds a strong market position as a diversified investment group in Central Europe, leveraging a portfolio that spans key sectors. Their business model centers on long-term value creation, supported by consistent profits and capital investments. The company targets institutional investors and partners, with a clear emphasis on sustainability and social responsibility. Their digital presence includes active social media channels and a multilingual website, indicating a broad geographic reach. The partnership with Penta Fund suggests an ecosystem approach to investment management. Growth indicators include recent news of record profits and leadership updates. The company maintains multiple office locations across Europe, reinforcing its regional footprint.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of published security or incident response policies indicate areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager is managed with consent. The missing WHOIS data raises a slight concern regarding domain registration transparency, which should be addressed to enhance trust. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be elevated by formalizing policies and improving header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Establish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures and improve communication with security researchers.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party plugins and scripts to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced via dependencies.
  5. Verify and update domain WHOIS information to ensure consistency and enhance domain registration trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
PENTA INVESTMENTS LIMITED
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Penta Investments
Description
Penta Investments is a long-term investment group with over 30 years of experience, employing more than 50,000 people. They focus on building successful companies across multiple sectors including retail, healthcare, real estate, financial services, manufacturing, and media. They emphasize responsible business practices and social responsibility.
Key services
Investment management, Portfolio company development, Social responsibility initiatives
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Slick Slider, UIkit, WordPress
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  3. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual and warrants caution
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies present with consent mechanisms
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information
  6. Multiple office locations with phone numbers and addresses provided
  7. Social media presence across major platforms
  8. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (WordPress)
  9. No forms detected on main page; no direct data collection forms visible
  10. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities in HTML content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for scripting, and Slick Slider for interactive elements. The site loads with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Accessibility is basic but functional. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking, integrated with a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism. There is room for improvement in performance optimization and accessibility enhancements to further improve user experience and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 81/100Low23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pentainvestments.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pentainvestments.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.