WSFS Bank · Finance · United States
Low risk. No critical or high findings.
WSFS Bank is a well-established financial institution with nearly 200 years of history, serving individuals, businesses, and communities primarily in the United States. The website reflects a professional banking service provider with a focus on community upliftment and comprehensive financial services. The digital infrastructure is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Yoast SEO and Kadence Blocks, indicating a mature and maintainable technical environment. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, though some accessibility features could be improved. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data exposure; however, the absence of explicit security policies and incident response contacts suggests room for enhancement in transparency and compliance. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which is a critical area for improvement given the nature of financial services. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures to align with best practices.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
The NIS2 figure counts only evidence anyone can see from the internet. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
The DMARC policy is p=none, so mail that fails authentication is still delivered; the record only collects reports.
What to do: Review the aggregate reports, then move to p=quarantine and finally p=reject.
This scan found 11 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention wsfsbank.com, from OffSeq Breach.
5 subdomains affected
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for wsfsbank.com.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with wsfsbank.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wsfsbank.com.