Skip to main content

Security report for pelcro.com

Pelcro Inc. · Technology · Canada

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pelcro Inc. is a Canadian technology company specializing in subscription management solutions for businesses offering digital memberships, subscriptions, magazines, and newspapers. The company positions itself as an all-in-one platform with advanced AI capabilities to enhance billing experiences and customer engagement. Their website showcases a comprehensive suite of services including billing, dynamic paywalls, user dashboards, and integrations with major payment and accounting platforms like QuickBooks. The target audience includes businesses across various sectors seeking to optimize subscription revenue and customer management. Technically, the website is built on the Wix platform using React 18, integrating multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and HubSpot. However, the site suffers from a lack of a valid SSL certificate and absence of advanced DNS security features like DNSSEC and CAA records, which are critical for secure operations. The security posture is basic with some email security measures like SPF and DMARC in place but lacks HTTPS enforcement and modern TLS protocols. Overall, Pelcro demonstrates a solid business and technical foundation but needs to address critical security gaps to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of pelcro.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pelcro.com

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
35
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Pelcro operates in the technology sector, focusing on subscription management solutions that cater to a wide range of industries including media, e-commerce, and SaaS. Their business model revolves around providing a platform that simplifies subscription billing, customer management, and marketing automation. The company leverages AI to offer advanced reporting and personalized customer experiences. Pelcro's market position is strengthened by its comprehensive feature set and integrations with popular tools like QuickBooks and HubSpot. The presence of multiple dynamic pages and detailed content indicates active marketing and customer engagement efforts. The company maintains a medium-sized profile with a consistent brand image and good content quality. Their partnership with HubSpot and use of professional marketing tools suggest a strategic approach to growth and customer acquisition.

Security posture

The current security posture of Pelcro's website is basic and requires significant improvements. While the domain has SPF and DMARC records configured with a quarantine policy, indicating some level of email security, the absence of DNSSEC and CAA records exposes the domain to potential DNS spoofing and unauthorized certificate issuance. Critically, the website lacks a valid SSL certificate and does not support modern TLS protocols, which undermines secure data transmission and user trust. The site also does not implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), leaving it vulnerable to downgrade attacks. No explicit security policy or incident response information is found, which is a gap in transparency and readiness. Overall, the security measures are minimal and do not meet best practices for a technology platform handling sensitive subscription and payment data.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate supporting modern protocols (TLS 1.2 or higher) to secure all web traffic.
  2. Enable and configure HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload options to enforce HTTPS.
  3. Implement DNSSEC to protect DNS integrity and prevent spoofing attacks.
  4. Add CAA DNS records to restrict which certificate authorities can issue certificates for the domain.
  5. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform utilizing React 18 and various Wix-specific components and widgets. It integrates multiple third-party services including Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, Sentry for error monitoring, and social media platforms. The hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing some performance and security benefits. However, the site exhibits slow performance with a high page load time (~17 seconds) and large page size (~2.5 MB), which could impact user experience. Mobile optimization is basic with some responsive design elements but limited advanced features. SEO is well addressed with structured data (JSON-LD), Open Graph tags, and canonical links. The technical stack is modern but requires optimization in security and performance areas to reduce technical debt and improve operational resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 74/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pelcro.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pelcro.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.