Skip to main content

Security report for pearlgroup.no

Pearl Group · Technology · Norway

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pearl Group is a Nordic technology company specializing in SAP and Hybris business system solutions, positioning itself as the largest SAP partner in the Nordic region. The website reflects a professional B2B service provider targeting businesses seeking rapid and secure implementation of new business systems. The company leverages HubSpot CMS and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools to support its digital presence. The technical infrastructure is modern with standard libraries and tracking technologies, though some security best practices such as security headers and explicit privacy policies are lacking. The website is secured with HTTPS and employs a cookie consent mechanism, indicating awareness of privacy compliance, albeit with room for improvement. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized security policies. The domain WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is typical for business websites, and no suspicious indicators were found. Strategic recommendations include publishing comprehensive privacy and security policies, adding security headers, and providing clear contact information to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pearlgroup.no

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pearlgroup.no, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for pearlgroup.no right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Pearl Group operates in the technology sector with a focus on SAP and Hybris solutions, serving primarily Nordic businesses. Its market position as the largest SAP partner in the region suggests a strong competitive advantage and established client base. The business model is B2B consulting and implementation services, likely generating revenue through project engagements and ongoing support. The website's use of HubSpot and multiple marketing tools indicates a mature digital marketing strategy. However, the absence of explicit contact details and privacy policies may limit customer trust and regulatory compliance. The company appears to maintain a professional brand image with consistent messaging and quality content. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified from the data provided.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a cookie consent banner powered by Cookiebot, demonstrating compliance with basic privacy regulations. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others suggests potential areas for hardening. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which could hinder responsible vulnerability reporting. The presence of multiple third-party tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks, though these are common in marketing-focused sites. No exposed sensitive data or known vulnerabilities were detected in the analyzed content. Incident response and security policies are not publicly available, indicating a gap in transparency and preparedness. Overall, the security posture is moderate with opportunities for improvement in policy publication and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve transparency and compliance.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  4. Provide clear and accessible contact information including security and general inquiry emails and phone numbers.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and tracking technologies to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pearl Group
Description
Med Pearl Group på laget kommer du raskt og sikkert opp på et nytt forretningssystem med våre malbaserte løsninger for SAP og Hybris.
Key services
SAP implementation, Hybris solutions, Business system consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.1, Slick Carousel, HubSpot CMS, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Cookiebot
Platforms
HubSpot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms (Facebook), Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, HubSpot tracking
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and uses HubSpot CMS
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with Cookiebot
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content
  4. WHOIS data is not publicly available, indicating privacy protection
  5. Multiple third-party tracking and marketing scripts are used
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content provided
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  8. No explicit security policies or incident response information found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on HubSpot CMS, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 3.7.1 and Slick Carousel for UI components. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics platforms including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses Google Fonts for typography. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of some CSS and JS assets. Accessibility features are basic but present. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were identified. Hosting provider details were not available from the provided data. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional web presence suitable for B2B marketing and lead generation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 74/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pearlgroup.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pearlgroup.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.