Skip to main content

Security report for peaktechnology.at

Peak Technology · Technology · Austria

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

35/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Peak Technology is a specialized engineering company focused on manufacturing bespoke carbon fibre components and high pressure vessels primarily for the space and motorsport industries. The company positions itself as a trusted partner with over 15 years of motorsport championship involvement and expertise in space mission components. Their business model is B2B, providing high-tech composite solutions with certifications such as ISO 9001 and EN 9100 that underline their quality management commitment. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with modern SEO practices and structured data, targeting industry professionals and partners. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS implementation is a critical security gap that undermines trust and data protection. The site lacks a cookie consent mechanism despite setting cookies, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are visible. Overall, the technical infrastructure is moderate with room for improvement in security and privacy compliance. Strategic recommendations include immediate SSL deployment, enhanced security headers, and formalized security policies to improve the security posture and trustworthiness of the digital presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching peaktechnology.at

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
0
Average
35

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Peak Technology operates in a niche market segment combining advanced composite manufacturing for space and motorsport sectors. Their competitive advantage lies in in-house engineering capabilities and long-standing motorsport success. The company targets professional clients requiring high-performance components, leveraging certifications to assure quality. The website content and structure support a professional B2B engagement model, with clear navigation to key service areas and career opportunities. The LinkedIn presence supports professional networking and recruitment. The lack of phone contact and physical address on the website may limit some client trust but is mitigated by detailed downloadable company information. The company appears stable and focused on quality and innovation, with potential growth in aerospace and motorsport industries.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a low security maturity level due to the absence of HTTPS and valid SSL certificates, exposing users to potential interception risks. Security headers are minimal, and no advanced protections such as HSTS or OCSP stapling are implemented. The site does not provide a vulnerability disclosure policy or security contact channels, which limits incident response readiness. Cookie management lacks user consent mechanisms, which may impact GDPR compliance. While no known vulnerabilities or malware are detected, the lack of secure transport and security best practices significantly reduces the security posture. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS configuration and implementation of security headers and policies is critical to reduce risk and improve compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Deploy a valid SSL certificate and enable HTTPS site-wide immediately.
  2. Implement HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce secure connections.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Introduce a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR requirements.
  5. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response.
  6. Enhance privacy policy with explicit cookie and data processing details.
  7. Consider adding contact phone numbers and physical address to improve business credibility.
  8. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and plugins to avoid vulnerabilities.
  9. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption for improved SSL performance and security.
  10. Maintain and promote certifications and trust indicators prominently on the website.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with Apache server hosting on Google Cloud infrastructure. It uses jQuery 3.7.1 and Bootstrap framework for responsive design. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO Premium plugin with comprehensive metadata and JSON-LD structured data. Performance metrics are not provided but inferred slow due to missing resource counts and load time data. The site is mobile optimized and accessible with semantic HTML and ARIA landmarks. However, the lack of HTTPS and modern TLS protocols is a significant technical risk. The site uses cookies for language preferences but lacks consent mechanisms. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. Overall, the technical stack is modern but requires urgent security upgrades and performance monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with peaktechnology.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review peaktechnology.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.