Skip to main content

Security report for pdk.pl

Aftermarket.pl Limited · Technology · Poland

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Aftermarket.pl Limited operates the largest domain marketplace in Poland, providing a platform for buying, selling, and auctioning internet domain names. The company also offers complementary services such as hosting, mail, SSL certificates, and website creation tools, targeting domain investors, businesses, and internet entrepreneurs. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and multilingual support, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript technologies, integrates with major social and analytics platforms, and uses HTTPS with secure form handling, although security headers could be enhanced. Privacy and cookie consent mechanisms are robust and GDPR compliant, supporting user data protection. The domain offered for sale (pdk.pl) lacks public WHOIS data, which is typical for domains listed on marketplaces and does not indicate suspicious activity. Overall, the platform demonstrates a strong market position in the Polish domain industry with good security and privacy practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pdk.pl

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
75
Email security
67
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a significant position in the Polish domain market, leveraging a comprehensive online marketplace business model that includes direct sales, auctions, and domain catching services. Revenue streams likely include commissions on sales and auctions, hosting and related service fees. The target customer base includes domain investors, small to medium businesses, and digital entrepreneurs. The presence of social media channels and marketing integrations indicates active customer engagement and brand building. Partnerships with domain generation tools and integration of payment and tracking services suggest a well-developed ecosystem. The company appears to be medium-sized with a focus on technology and e-commerce sectors.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses CSRF tokens in forms, indicating good baseline security practices. Integration of Facebook SDK and Google services is done asynchronously to reduce risk. Cookie consent and privacy policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Incident response contact is available via an abuse reporting page. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved with additional headers and regular third-party script audits.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and incident response procedures.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate supply chain risks.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Maintain transparency on domain WHOIS data where possible to improve trust for domain buyers.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Aftermarket.pl Limited
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aftermarket.pl Limited
Description
Aftermarket.pl is the largest domain marketplace in Poland offering domain sales, auctions, and related services.
Key services
Domain sales, Domain auctions, Domain catching, Hosting, Mail services, Website creation, SSL certificates
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, FontFace API, Facebook SDK, Google Analytics, Google Sign-In, Service Workers, SVG graphics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF tokens in forms
  • Secure login forms with password show/hide
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdWords, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Google AdWords, Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a domain marketplace platform focused on Polish market
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear navigation and multilingual support
  3. Strong privacy and cookie consent mechanisms in place
  4. No WHOIS data available publicly for the domain offered for sale
  5. Multiple social media and marketing integrations present
  6. No signs of blocking or WAF interference
  7. Security headers could be improved
  8. Forms use CSRF tokens and secure input handling
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern web technologies including asynchronous JavaScript loading, service workers for offline capabilities, and font loading optimizations. It integrates with major analytics and marketing platforms such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. The site is mobile optimized with responsive CSS and theme switching capabilities. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility. The lack of a detected CMS suggests a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional e-commerce marketplace but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pdk.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pdk.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.