Skip to main content

Security report for pavlovec.net

Gransy, s.r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pavlovec.net is a Czech-based web development service specializing in WordPress websites, boasting over 13 years of experience. The website presents a professional and focused offering targeting small to medium-sized clients seeking custom WordPress and WooCommerce solutions. The business appears stable and legitimate, supported by a long domain registration history and consistent WHOIS data. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Vue.js, and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The site is mobile optimized with smooth navigation features, though accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic. Security posture is moderate; while no critical vulnerabilities are evident, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers, as well as lack of visible HTTPS enforcement details, suggest room for improvement. Privacy compliance is weak, with no privacy or cookie policies and no consent mechanism for tracking scripts. Overall, the site is functional and credible but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pavlovec.net

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
45
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a small technology service provider focused on WordPress web development in the Czech Republic. Its competitive advantage lies in long-term experience and a clear service portfolio including WooCommerce integration. The business model is service-based, targeting local clients likely including small businesses and individuals. The website content and structure support client engagement through service descriptions, references, and contact options. The lack of explicit contact details beyond an email-like header link may limit immediate client outreach. The company is registered with Gransy, s.r.o., a Czech registrar, reinforcing local market positioning. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data. Growth potential could be enhanced by adding more transparent contact information and compliance documentation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. It uses HTTPS (implied by external Google Analytics scripts loaded over HTTPS), but no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended best practice for domain security. No forms or input fields were found, reducing attack surface, but also limiting data collection transparency. The use of third-party tracking scripts without visible consent mechanisms indicates a compliance gap with GDPR and related privacy regulations. Incident response and security policies are not published. Overall, the site is low risk but should improve DNS security, implement security headers, and add privacy and cookie policies to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS integrity and security.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies and implement a consent mechanism for tracking scripts to comply with GDPR.
  4. Verify and enforce HTTPS across the entire site with proper SSL/TLS configuration.
  5. Add explicit contact information including phone number and physical address to improve business credibility and client trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gransy, s.r.o.
Description
A web development service specializing in WordPress websites with 13 years of experience, offering services, references, and pricing information primarily targeting Czech-speaking clients.
Key services
WordPress web development, WooCommerce integration, Web design and coding
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, Vue.js, Google Analytics, WooCommerce, WordPress
Frameworks
Vue.js
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is in Czech language targeting local clients.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact email is implied in header logo text but no explicit mailto link.
  4. No phone numbers or physical addresses found on the homepage.
  5. Uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking without visible consent mechanism.
  6. No forms detected on the homepage content.
  7. Mobile menu implemented with jQuery and smoothState.js for page transitions.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data.
  9. DNSSEC not enabled, which is a minor security gap.
  10. Domain is stable and long-lived, registered with a known Czech registrar.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, and Vue.js, integrated with WordPress and WooCommerce platforms. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is mobile optimized with a responsive menu and smooth page transitions. Performance is moderate, with no explicit speed metrics but use of asynchronous script loading. Accessibility features are basic, with no ARIA or advanced accessibility markup detected. SEO optimization is minimal but includes standard meta tags. Hosting appears stable with DNS servers linked to the registrar Gransy, s.r.o. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which could be addressed to reduce attack surface and improve security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pavlovec.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pavlovec.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.